My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2022
>
09-26-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2022 10:58:46 AM
Creation date
12/8/2022 10:45:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />September 12, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br /> <br />16. LA22-000041 - Eskuche Design o/b/o Chris Heim, 3005 Casco Point Road, Variance <br /> <br />Michael Gorman, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis presented a summary packet of information stating the Applicant has plans to combine the existing <br />three Hartzell Addition properties into two. Half of the existing middle lot, 2987 Casco Point Road, will <br />be combined with the “tennis court lot” and the remaining half of 2987 Casco Point Road will <br />be combined with 3005 Casco Point Road, resulting in the subject property for this application. For the <br />purpose of this application the Council should treat the newly enlarged subject property as existing due to <br />the orientation of the property in relation to the neighboring homes and the curvature of the shoreline, the <br />Applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the new home. The home has been <br />designed to be sensitive to the existing views of the home at 3015 Casco Point Road. In August the <br />Planning Commission held a public hearing and received public comment. The Seidells spoke in support <br />and have provided supportive comments included in the packet. Following the discussion the <br />Commission voted 3 to 2 to deny the requested Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS) variance consistent <br />with Staff recommendation citing lack of practical difficulty. Staff’s practical difficulty analysis reflects a <br />lack of practical difficulty to support the variance request and for this reason Staff recommends denial. <br /> <br />Michael Gorman, along with Chris Heim, is one of the co-owners of the properties. He noted they have <br />gone through some iterations on the project including going from three homes down to two and a core <br />objective is to create homes that are very consistent with the neighborhood. The plan in place moves the <br />home back 28 feet from where the current structure is and they are trying to work to preserve lakeshore, <br />protect sight lines for neighbors, and build homes consistent with the overall feel of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Sven Gustafson, Stonewood, 153 Lake Street E, Wayzata, stated the practical difficulty on the project is <br />the shape of the lot to the south (Seidell property) and the location of their house on the lot because it is <br />further back from the lake than most other homes on the lakeshore due to the flag lot. He showed a slide <br />on screen demonstrating the issue. He noted if the owners of the two homes were to coordinate on the <br />timing of the construction of their two homes and were to push the home on the northern lot closer to the <br />lake meeting the ALS, they could virtually achieve the position of the home requested in this variance <br />request. However if they do that the home will now be an outlier sitting in front of the Goodwin’s house. <br />He shared about moving the house 28 feet further back, keeping the rooflines from being an impedance, <br />and curing a sideyard setback on the property. For these reasons the Applicants are asking the City <br />Council to approve. <br /> <br />Johnson asked about Lot 1, the tennis court lot, and Lot 2 which is proposed to be built upon first. He <br />asked by granting this variance, the Council is not giving any new privilege to Lot 1 to be closer to the <br />lake? <br /> <br />Curtis replied in the negative. <br /> <br />Johnson thinks the rendering showing the old house versus the new is very clever, a good way to see it, <br />and they did a good job getting the neighbors on board, as well. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh stated when he heard that the house was going further away from the lake than it is today, <br />that was what he needed to hear and was all good with it.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.