Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />September 12, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br /> <br />16. LA22-000041 - Eskuche Design o/b/o Chris Heim, 3005 Casco Point Road, Variance <br /> <br />Michael Gorman, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis presented a summary packet of information stating the Applicant has plans to combine the existing <br />three Hartzell Addition properties into two. Half of the existing middle lot, 2987 Casco Point Road, will <br />be combined with the “tennis court lot” and the remaining half of 2987 Casco Point Road will <br />be combined with 3005 Casco Point Road, resulting in the subject property for this application. For the <br />purpose of this application the Council should treat the newly enlarged subject property as existing due to <br />the orientation of the property in relation to the neighboring homes and the curvature of the shoreline, the <br />Applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the new home. The home has been <br />designed to be sensitive to the existing views of the home at 3015 Casco Point Road. In August the <br />Planning Commission held a public hearing and received public comment. The Seidells spoke in support <br />and have provided supportive comments included in the packet. Following the discussion the <br />Commission voted 3 to 2 to deny the requested Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS) variance consistent <br />with Staff recommendation citing lack of practical difficulty. Staff’s practical difficulty analysis reflects a <br />lack of practical difficulty to support the variance request and for this reason Staff recommends denial. <br /> <br />Michael Gorman, along with Chris Heim, is one of the co-owners of the properties. He noted they have <br />gone through some iterations on the project including going from three homes down to two and a core <br />objective is to create homes that are very consistent with the neighborhood. The plan in place moves the <br />home back 28 feet from where the current structure is and they are trying to work to preserve lakeshore, <br />protect sight lines for neighbors, and build homes consistent with the overall feel of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Sven Gustafson, Stonewood, 153 Lake Street E, Wayzata, stated the practical difficulty on the project is <br />the shape of the lot to the south (Seidell property) and the location of their house on the lot because it is <br />further back from the lake than most other homes on the lakeshore due to the flag lot. He showed a slide <br />on screen demonstrating the issue. He noted if the owners of the two homes were to coordinate on the <br />timing of the construction of their two homes and were to push the home on the northern lot closer to the <br />lake meeting the ALS, they could virtually achieve the position of the home requested in this variance <br />request. However if they do that the home will now be an outlier sitting in front of the Goodwin’s house. <br />He shared about moving the house 28 feet further back, keeping the rooflines from being an impedance, <br />and curing a sideyard setback on the property. For these reasons the Applicants are asking the City <br />Council to approve. <br /> <br />Johnson asked about Lot 1, the tennis court lot, and Lot 2 which is proposed to be built upon first. He <br />asked by granting this variance, the Council is not giving any new privilege to Lot 1 to be closer to the <br />lake? <br /> <br />Curtis replied in the negative. <br /> <br />Johnson thinks the rendering showing the old house versus the new is very clever, a good way to see it, <br />and they did a good job getting the neighbors on board, as well. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh stated when he heard that the house was going further away from the lake than it is today, <br />that was what he needed to hear and was all good with it.