Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, August 15, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />Oakden replied the current sign encroaches into the right-of-way and the new sign is proposing a zero <br />foot setback but would eliminate the right-of-way encroachment. However both signs would be located <br />in the utility easement. <br /> <br />McCutcheon asked about the details of the sign. <br /> <br />Oakden replied the sign the monument signage will include the business name, a digital changeable <br />signage area, and a faux stone base. <br /> <br />William Salvador of 612 Signs spoke about the visibility which is important for safety and showed a <br />photo on screen noting there have been 3 accidents this year and people cannot see the sign going <br />eastbound. The new sign is a lot more visible and that the current sign does not represent Orono as it is <br />two plastic posts and a panel. They would like to design something really beautiful with architectural <br />stone and down-lighting at the entrance of the town. He does not know that they are married to having the <br />sign at the edge but because there is an existing sign there Mr. Salvador recommended it. He noted they <br />are taking something existing and ugly, bringing it closer to the building, and making it a foot shorter; it is <br />the same size and same place but closer to the building, more visible and thus safer, and much prettier. <br /> <br />Kirchner asked what the digital display would scroll. <br /> <br />Mr. Salvador thinks it needs to be static; while it can change it needs to be a certain frequency. He cannot <br />speak for the owner but thinks he would say it is not that important. What is important is that they just <br />paid a ton of money to redo the siding and make it more beautiful and want to make the signage more <br />beautiful. If a digital display makes it worse in terms of the Planning Commission’s acceptance, Mr. <br />Salvador thinks they would remove it. They are asking for their opinion and can make changes and he <br />reiterated they are trying to make something prettier than the plastic posts there currently. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon noted it is already known for being an accident area and they do not want to make <br />more distractions which is why they are sensitive on the digital display. <br /> <br />Mr. Salvador spoke about driving on the road near the curve and sightlines of the building, noting one <br />does not see the current sign until they are in front of the business. People then hit the brakes to pull in <br />and from the other direction people cannot see those pulling out or coming across until the last minute <br />which is why there have been many accidents. He clarified the relevance of the sign’s proportion as <br />previously there was a longer name and all sorts of mumbo-jumbo. Now the sign displays the name <br />“River Valley” in large letters so one can read it further out. <br /> <br />McCutcheon asked if the current sign is being hit by snow plows as it is so close to the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Salvador replied it has been there 20 years and noted the posts do not have marks on them. The new <br />one will be about 30 inches further in. <br /> <br />Oakden clarified it abuts roughly two feet into the right-of-way currently and showed the edge of the <br />right-of-way and the edge of the pavement. She reached out to Public Works for comment and they did <br />not have any comments regarding the placement. The City Engineer replied regarding the encroachment <br />agreement over the utility easement. <br />