Laserfiche WebLink
se it lacks <br />urvey showing <br />erty line, <br />you feel a <br />applicant <br />mbined Lots 16 <br />j’J-v' <br />i <br />■‘ifM <br />n <br />: It <br />1#- <br />•; •4 <br />r.'-- <br />■' <br />" % <br />. -Vt M <br />m <br />¥■■ ■ <br />#■ <br />r *iF- [I?* - • <br />Lire esTATE FLANN lNd OENEHAL INtUMANCe SUAV V 8 <br />^utt)Ul Jlgeqcy <br />EXHIBSt <br />1S21 HOPKINS CROSSROAD <br />MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55343 <br />(612) 546-6777 <br />July 19, 1983 <br />Ms. Jeanne Mabusth <br />Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Post Office Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />[l©[i0\5^[i <br />• I <br />AUG- i 1963 <br />CITY OF ORQHO <br />Dear Ms. Mabusth <br />I received a telephone call late last week from Douglas H. <br />Smith who you know to be the party who is applying for a <br />building permit on a lot which I sold to him in April of <br />1977. He was quite upset, apparently having talked to his <br />contractor who represented him at the Council meeting that <br />preceding Monday. While he did not himself attend the <br />meeting, nor did I, he left me with the impression that <br />Inferences where made that I sold him a lot which I knew to <br />be unbulldable. I was greatly disturbed by any statement <br />which would be made suggesting such an act on my part. This <br />thing continues to annoy me and 1 wish to set the record <br />straight. <br />The lot in question. Lot 18, Spring Park Addition was a <br />separately platted lot of record on January 1, 1975. It was <br />originally platted in 1883, I believe. It has always been a <br />separate lot with its own separate tax statement. The lot <br />was titled in my name as a single individual as opposed to <br />a multiple or corporate ownership. While I may not have <br />received a building permit without approval of the Council, <br />according to the zoning code, because it was not within 80Z <br />of the sanctioned width and area size, the code did allow <br />such a use for a single family residence "provided that in <br />the judgment of the Council such use does not adversely <br />affect public health or safety". I believed then as now <br />that a building permit, with proper setbacks, <br />all of those tests, in keeping <br />neighborhood. <br />with the <br />etc. <br />rest <br />meets <br />of the <br />Sincerely, <br />• Richard Tuthlll <br />cc. Douglas H. Smith <br />• :• ” ... .; • <br />August 2 <br />Jeanne V. <br />Zoning P <br />City of <br />P.O. Bo)( <br />Crystal <br />Dear Ms, <br />This le <br />variance <br />pending <br />I will <br />as you <br />what yo <br />As you <br />and ha\ <br />Certain: <br />purchasi <br />continui <br />preparei <br />benefit <br />am asto <br />Please <br />require <br />what im; <br />varianc <br />I am al <br />that th <br />of new <br />to admi <br />fail tc <br />new sta <br />tabling <br />this ye <br />of bei <br />mertito <br />has ini <br />was no