Laserfiche WebLink
FHWBBT-y <br />Page 11 <br />»en made aware of <br />Toblems from the <br />method was an <br />utes of July 28, <br />• methods for the <br />ch*s application <br />ty Engineer, the <br />jhbors. Goetten <br />es in Orono that <br />«rall solved the <br />the drainageway. <br />» Nays (1). <br />that he felt that <br />muskrats is very <br />has a very well <br />ty problem he has <br />plication may be <br />I step into one of <br />small child could <br />the holes caused <br />ipplication in it <br />te record and it <br />»ifhile doing the <br />tn ownership. <br />is application. <br />Ider was present <br />^nership problem <br />lems with this <br />lot of separate <br />oblem with this <br />ad any comments. <br />opposed to this <br />ots are so close <br />be bad. <br />3e opposed to the <br />i lots being so <br />lot isn’t right <br />n it? <br />SMITH (CONT) <br />#762 THOMAS CORSON <br />4195 HIGHWOOD ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />. MIHiJTBS OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983. <br />Page 12 <br />"^owne^^M rf ch was advised of the common <br />and that^ currently by the Cityt^he Planning Commission would have to <br />studrtTi Smith's application until that <br />shniii'a K po™Pleted. Habusth advised that Smith <br />with Staf/*an®d" PI °PP°''t“nity to address the issue witn state and Planning Commission. <br />appllcatiot Douglas Smith's variance <br />question and common ownership <br />Adams seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Bi®' ^.°tson were present. Mabusth reviewed <br />with the Planning Commission Mr. Corson's reauesh oTt <br />setback variance for a detached garage. St wTshet to <br />keep the same setback of the exiitin| garage which it <br />tiLe M ® 24' detached gatage it itt <br />gtttgt? "'’® ^PP“=®"t why he needed such a large <br />«aocbie <br />wttn"tTs'° ® " hobb7shop:° HU=0 its because o^f-tha"t!No plumbing will be installed. <br />twlltttion''®‘^ot° ^PP'^®''® setback variance <br />cttstructttn of a L°"x^ ?4'"'d°e7a°ched'° '='’® <br />the following findings and htrdshipsV'^’® <br />1. Slope of land to the south of the proposed garage. <br />2. Location of a mature oak and several small trees. <br />3. Proposed setback will allow use of existing gravel <br />urnaround and cut down on additional hardcover. <br />Approval is subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Doors of garage must face away from the street. <br />bttkitrtut o°nto®Hlthwtod"Rtal? ®‘'=® ' <br />Slme seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Zoning Di <br />Area - 12 <br />Applicable <br />Street Se <br />Required <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Variance <br />Side Setbc <br />Required - <br />Existing - <br />Proposed ■ <br />Variance - <br />List of E> <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibig G <br />The applic <br />garage on <br />garage. T <br />south. Lot <br />for the gi <br />Lot Area <br />75-250 a] <br />Allowed 1 <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Total hai