Laserfiche WebLink
•;r; 'i <br />oad serving the <br />It should be <br />be approved for the <br />drive and sewer <br />esolved by the <br />ivate sewer and <br />way of Shadywood. <br />n this review. <br />iing created along <br />:ial units pose <br />access under the <br />:y not included <br />I ted too close to <br />sly close to the <br />Lty can certainly <br />3 matter. Remember, <br />ifined interest in <br />I along to the <br />litional dedications <br />)plirant should be <br />jiuded in areas for <br />>n revised plat. I <br />lated on the plat <br />that the applicant's <br />and water service <br />y on the existing <br />d. The new owners <br />as required in that <br />ill serve the duplex <br />nes. The Public <br />rlying road and <br />1 remain private. <br />*s right to require <br />mits for any work <br />.rmed in a final <br />;y of Minnesota <br />\t for local fire <br />cists between the <br />ixpaying entity. <br />‘1^- <br />•• ’i" <br />£ <br />X <br />fX <br />^ i <br />I <br />i <br />#788 - Freshwater Foundation <br />November 18, 1983 <br />Page 3 <br />A park fee will be required - payment shcedule as follows: <br />duplex i $1,000) = $3,000Single family (one single § $400) = 800 <br />Total part fee payment = <br />Rezoning <br />irnSt"! S?mirted°Sse®irrco^r- 35.310 - residential <br />notified twicl. 1 have riceivid f??®: ’’'’® have been <br />rezoning. The proposed use will °°'"Pl®te support of the <br />the Comprehensive ElndUsrpTai norw??, ;?^®®"^^^*^ ofendangerment to the publil health residential use pose an <br />approval of the zoning application ? Proposal, staff recommends <br />PRD - Duplex Credit - Conditional Use Permit <br />MinCCCtroC^G!F!B??"CSCs^l0^2racr« "°"“.®PP®“ the University of <br />Foundation to approximately i8?49 acres ThC^ia*^ °""®‘* ‘*3' thecredit affords ample area to ea*-acres per wetlands <br />(34.452) as follows! satisfy standards of PRD (38.610) and LR-LB <br />Required - one unit per one acre/43,560 so f^ <br />Proposed - one unit per 2.3 acresAoif^C^f^rt. <br />rCiClmiC“re^gh“Lrts^rt Tt «>«<3itymust be assured that <br />density ratio. ^Whatevlr the given <br />remainder of the land, eight acres must^^^«\*'®^ a” future for the this approval. ^ ®®t aside as a condition of <br />duplex unit^should'^be^credited as^two”Snits’r^^'*^whether the whether the units should be cred^era^^w^ requiring two acres or <br />acre, in approving a duplex credit for two residential units per one <br />that only 100% of single lot standards be requires <br />sought by the applicant to permit attachf»H nni’i- the duplex credit <br />density ratio, b^ed on tL^dupiL creS shou?/5^®^^changed as follows: ^ ^ credit, should the density ratio be <br />“its) one unit per 3.7 acres/ <br />^^