Laserfiche WebLink
tv--, •• <br />Page 7mm .......... ■ ■ <br />nON #1267* <br />Kroger <br />Run <br />:iAL BUILDING <br />ioreline Drive <br />Creer <br />Drth Shore Drive <br />5 Carl <br />LNCE <br />'onkawa Road <br />.1 Pough <br />T <br />1 <br />■4 <br /><■ K <br />I <br />’ JT. <br />zv <br />Liii <br />'mm <br />k".AiW <br />,v <br />f; <br />*‘V‘ <br />f •: <br />UTES OF A PLANNING CO.-.-USSION MEETING HELD ON sept E^^^A'^^z J igrr^-pAcTs <br />revLwef thri^fo^atl.n^'’® Ad„,inistrator <br />Conunission on this application^*^^A Planning <br />existing hardcover and ^ survey of the <br />four other homeHn the Carl ZT the <br />to be more excessive when compaJld*’to*’°°‘^ Proved <br />proposed by Carl. planning improvements <br />that the neighbortoo^ imp?ovfm^'“"°"during the 60's and Carles aoDlicaf"®'^® •‘^°™‘’^®ted <br />to todays more restrictive s^a^dards? <br />^ CHARLES CARL <br />3685 North Shore Dr>'ve <br />VARIANCE <br />(#578) <br />Wf' <br />m <br />A review was made of >. <br />involving improvements applications <br />In each lase!^ thrippUcaUcns^w® °'''' "^^back area, <br />on either drainage imorov»^°2f ^^sedon either drainage imDrov».i°''! approved based ' <br />hardcover located closer to®?hl fhorllinl^ existing <br />located^4^®Lrther*’awa^*’f construction will be <br />noted that according to submittL®’’?'^®^^"®' “^busth located in the 4' area “^""ibbed plans, a deck was <br />Planning Commission advised r^yi 4-u ±. • • <br />addition is approved within <br />than the existLrgfrage^ould'haCl^a new garage would not -^ ® that <br />vacates thi propert^to ^he County <br />noted that even^^if Countv dn« P^^^Ping Commission <br />e 30- setback from traveled ^ of way <br />construction ofa garag^^UhL''?h^^garage within the protected area. <br />variance involving theTluow^^''°''? <br />variance - 35’; street sethaXt"^' setback <br />hardcover variance 0-75* safK*^ variance - 22.5'; <br />730 s.f., proposed additio^l oSO^r? ‘ <br />(minus existing garage) i2b^= ? 1 <br />the following Lrdships- <br />1- Location of existing house. <br />'■ on property located within <br />and based on the following findings: <br />3.' J^ope'rtl comprehensive Planoperty is sewered. <br />3. Compatible with neighborhood development. <br />neighbors support improvement to property. <br />Motion seconded by Jabbour. Vote; Ayes (6). <br />yv:v^ ^ i <br />. > • K <br />V-.i ■ <br />- * ■•.;- . *: <br />m <br />t <br />fc <br />i-. <br />m-m'- <br />fuTES OF A <br />Kr veyno made <br />the approvin <br />no additions <br />setback area <br />Ayes (6), Na <br />1 <br />Rovegno made <br />above noted <br />is vacated, , <br />to the prope; <br />Vote: Ayes <br />Minority Opin <br />be denied bas< <br />Addition <br />area. <br />2.Accordinc <br />viewed as <br />assessed <br />3.It would <br />completed <br />could be <br />Carl asked th <br />at the Octobe <br />Mr. Lorge an <br />Mr. & Mrs. R <br />Mrs. Sam Chi <br />Raoul Schand <br />The following j <br />position: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4; <br />5. <br />Lots o <br />The pr <br />develo <br />On pur <br />that t; <br />was ba; <br />Propen <br />receiv: <br />House j <br />6.He re( <br />but he <br />even an ambd <br />20jrijL_r)_o_