Laserfiche WebLink
incipal <br />ared lot <br />t line? Is <br />rrangement <br />1 the surrounding <br />Lth the pattern <br />.able to the <br />Ly footage charges <br />itional informa- <br />tar ly define <br />. not provide <br />standards of <br />to deny the <br />eld for approval <br />and in question <br />g property; and <br />r structures in \ \ ^. V • <br />preservation <br />applicant; and . .V . i: • <br />way impair <br />act be contrary <br />m: <br />rve as a <br />iviate <br />ta and lot <br />the City's <br />ficient <br />consider the <br />eed of <br />limitations <br />mmm. <br />'mm <br />#761 - Douglas Smith <br />September 13, 1983 <br />Page 3 <br />Or Planning Commission cannot make a determination because it lacks <br />additional information on Lots 16 & 17, specifically a survey showing <br />the existing house location and setback from shared property line. <br />I would advise that you only ask for this information if you feel a <br />lot line rearrangement is appropriate. You may find the applicant <br />will refuse this request since he has no control over combined Lots 16 & <br />17. <br />■