My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-1983 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983 Planning Packets
>
06-20-1983 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 4:22:09 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 3:28:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vm m .......I il^■■lllllllll■IMW <br />m <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />JO <br />K> <br />Cvi <br />I <br /><0 <br />r-» <br />1-4 <br />I <br />inm <br />CO <br />Kl <br />o <br />CM <br />O <br />o <br />r-4 <br />CJ <br />Kl <br />CM <br />I <br />I <br />CM <br />O <br />€0 <br />Kl <br />r r r r <br />•J<c <br />H <br />UJ r-l <br />4> <br />o o ro <br />< < in lu ui lu in <br />X X > <br />UJ Ui < <br />M 1-M 2 z <br />X X < X <br />XXX <br />>• < U U -i h- <br />q: q: << << o M <br />X X CM >- <br />CM •< <br />O ID f-i X <br />i-i <br />o <br />o <br />o <br /><ro <br />o <br />'' ' ; <br />u <br />>- <br />CD <br />< <br />O <br />o <br />lyu. <br />M <br />3 ro <r UJ <br />Kl CM U. < <br />O •4 K»O MXoQ m O 3 UJ M <br />r-l <br />ft ft > in <br />UJ UJ .J <br />UI Q. 9* <br />Kl > «• K^ <br />CNJ Z X (D < -J in <br />ro <br />UI Ui <br />CD to < Z <br />< o Ui in <br />Kl z X ft > <br />CVJ <C < 1- X CM < lU < < <br />1 3 3 *<1 X (3. uN <<0 >- z z <br />M -J Ui < X-> 1 >- X <br />•H < z •H X <br />1 UJ UI 3 O 1 <n in >- < <br />CM U U H in UJ UJ -j H <br />O M M O UJ Kl o ^ ^ < <br />CO <br />ft ft CM Z 3 3 in r <br />< < CM l-l <br />O ft ft O N <br />CM<<0>- <br />CO iH z X CVI <lO X X rH X m o u u M 3 <br />K> <br />nT <br />Kl <br />o in <br />« cr > in <br />Ui UJ <br />X X GO <br />UJ UJ <br />O O -t X< < H- X <br />X 3 < <br />1^4 < <br />UJ UJ <br />u u <br />!-• iH <br />q: a o z>< < <br />< <br />3 <br />o <br />CM <br />in <br />CM <br />O <br />H <br />UJ <br />o <br />o <br />0 <br />UJ<r >ro < <br />Kl 2 <br />CJ < <br />1 X <br />00 >• <br />I <br />inKl o <br />CM <br />CM <br />CO r-4 <br />ro O <br /><h* <br />UJ iH <br />Q o m <br />< < m <br />UJ UJ UJ in <br />X X > <br />UJ UJ < <br />H* <br />M M Z Z <br />>- ^ <br />U O -i H <br />q: a <<C ^ O N <br />X X CM >• <br />CJ < <br />O (D f-c 3 <br />a ttOG X Oa < a o <br />a X UI < <br />< >- \ <br />a < UJ <br />a. UJ Q. X <br />o X X 5 n: S < z ou o H <br />Ui CK <br />OK X O <br />O < ft O <br />O Z UJ < <br />< >• \ <br />ft < UI <br />OL UJ a X o z X ^ <br />ft 3 < Z <br />ft O I- <br />V.L <br />>%• <br />- -i- <br />•• ] <br />. i:? <br />ami <br />#-• <br />4 <br />0 <br />•i <br />:V <br />^ ■■! <br />•*^1 <br />■ f^ -.f. <br />» <br />highways § I.()6 <br />from ihat susiained by the public generally.** It is a consequence of the exbr- <br />else of a public right.*’ /T" <br />The Minnesota statute which provides for the dedication of roads cannot <br />be constructed to extend public dedication to a width greater than that of <br />actual public use without violating the constitutional prohibition against the <br />taking of public property without due process of law.** ^ <br />1.05. Reversion to nwni»r.--------------------------—&AA i.. <br />Upon the vacation, discontinuance, or abandonment of a highway the | <br />absolute title to the land reverts to the owner of the fee, who may or may J <br />_m>« be the abutting owner_jy DTM)n vacaiK)ii or ah;indonnu»nt n~-.r.iporty ^ <br />for highway purposes, title reverts to the dedicator when the plat so <br />provides although he is not an abutting owner.** <br />1.06. Pleading. <br />It is unnecessary to allege in a complaint that the municipality had funds <br />to make repairs; want of funds, if a defense at idl. is new matter to be <br />pleaded by ihc defendant.** It must be alleged in the complaint that the <br />street was a public street of the defendant.’® It must be alleged that the <br />suuitory notice of the los.s or injury hns been eiven,^* <br />Cases arc cited below involving the sufficiency of particular complaints.’* <br />64. Underwood v. Hinpire Towti [3d. <br />(1944)217 Minn. 385. 14 N.W.2d459 <br />65. hi. <br />66. Barfncdit v. Town 13d. (1975) .304 <br />Minn. 505. 232 N.W.2d 420. .See ,etv/iT* <br />ally U.S. Const, aincnd. .\IV; Mi.nn. <br />Const, an. I. § 2; Minn. .Si.at. 5 <br />160.05, subd. I. <br />67. Stccncrson v. romainc (imS) 106 <br />Minn. 225, 119 N.W. 400; State v <br />Murcks (1949) 228 Minn. 129. 36 <br />N.W.2d 594; Buck v. City of Winona <br />(l%5)27[ Minn. 145, 135 N.W.2d 190 <br />(where city condemned and paid for <br />easement to be used lor j>ark purposes, <br />upon release of its right to use land for <br />these purposes, land must revert to fee <br />owners). <br />68. State v. Marcks (1949) 228 .Minn. <br />129, 36 N.W.2d 594 (where eily had <br />abandoned use of property for highway <br />purposes long prior to date state <br />attempted to take it over as pan of high <br />way system, and such land reverted t»> <br />dedicator or its assigns by reason of plat <br />dedicating such land so providing, state <br />acquired no interest therein). <br />69. Shanle v. City of .Minneapolis <br />(l«7I) 17 Minn. .308 (C,il. 284); l.ind- <br />holm V City of St. Paul (1872) 19 .Minn. <br />245 (Gil. 204): Neizer v. City ofCrook- <br />ston (1894) 59 Minn. 244, 61 N.W'. 21. <br />70. .SVf Parrant v. First Div.. St. P. & <br />F. Ry. (1868) 13 .Minn. 311 (Gil. 286); <br />.Shanle v. City of Minneapolis (1871) 17 <br />Minn. 308 (Gil. 284); Furnell v. City of <br />St. Paul (1873) 20 Minn. 117 (Gil. 1 01); <br />Phelps V. City of Mankato (1876) 23 <br />Minn. 276; KIcopfert v. Citv of Minne <br />apolis (1903) ‘70 Minn. 158. 95 N.W. <br />7t. McLaughlin v. Citv of Brccken- <br />ridge (1913) 122 Minn. 154. 142 N.W. <br />1.34; Slate e.v r<’/. Clark v. Qninn (19)6) <br />1-32 Minn. 219. 156 N.W'. 2.S4 SVe <br />Minn Si ai 466.05; 4 Wm Mi k i,, ,.,. <br />I.. Rl \. 93 (1978) (notice of claim re <br />quirement under .Minnesota Municipal <br />Ion Liability Act). <br />72. Farrant v. First Div., .St. P. P. <br />R.R. (IShS) 13 Minn. 311 (Ciil. 286); <br />Lindholm v. City of St. Paul (1872) I'i <br />Minn. 245 (Gil. 21)4) (complaint held <br />sullicieni to insiify recovery for medical <br />1.3.3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.