Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP NOVEMBER 21, 1983. PAGE ®’•’I <br />ta« <br />5k <br />0(796 LACHLBN REED <br />(cont.) <br />-r] <br />* ./X - <br />v/.: 'y- <br />, . •• ..,■ •.:■■. ■ .-=:v.v.‘': ‘-.ji <br />5^a y # jOft; • <br />• ^ • : ; .r • • . ' <br />■•:. '4 <br />.*tr <br />y- <br />.;. •>4 T <br />■ ■■ ,.. V. ; •.- ■■•. ;.. ••• . ■ .!■.:■ ■. <br />1?^ • - ■• >. <br />■ <br />W <br />& t ^ . .? <br />M:: <br />^i"j <br />:;:-.x=K;|sx" <br />r -x- ' <br />Goetten stated that it is an expansion use of a garage <br />and that they are asking for a deck too, <br />Kelley asked what the hardship was? <br />Adams stated that there are many legitimate reasons <br />for denying the application based on the established <br />regulations. Adams noted considering the area and <br />spacing is such that there is no adverse affect on the <br />neighborhood, and that he is basicly in favor of <br />granting the variance. Adams noted that thcr.: are <br />employees going to work on the surrounding properties <br />(caretakers, etc). <br />Councilmember Adams stated that coiisidering this <br />individual and the area that it shouldn't be a future <br />problem. <br />Callahan agreed as far as it would be Mr. Reed but that a <br />future owner could have two houses. Callahan stated <br />that a future owner could tear down the caretakers <br />house and garage and have another buildable lot. <br />Callahan noted that it is a variance to an accessory <br />use. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that where a new <br />owner comes in is where the problem starts. <br />Chairman Rovegno moved to recommend approval to the <br />home occupation Section 32.340 based on the following <br />findings: <br />1. Office space is in a building detached from the <br />dwelling and on the separate lot from the owners <br />homestead and owner does live on the abutting property <br />separated by an unimproved public right of way. <br />2. Lack of ability to employee an assistant that this <br />will provide for employment of a secretary. One <br />employee only. <br />Approval based on the following conditions: <br />1. Applicant to sign off on a resolution stating that <br />this accessory use ceases when applicant/owner no <br />longer owns both Lots 1 and 3, Block 1 - this special <br />home occupation use is only approved for applicant <br />while he owns both Lots 1 and 3, Block 1. <br />2. Any change in ownership would terminate this <br />special accessory use and the new owner of Lot 1 would <br />have to reapply for such use of accessory structure. <br />3. Remodeled structure cannot be rented out and shall <br />not be considered a legal rental unit. <br />. ^ .'i,