Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP NOVEMBER 21, 1983. PAGE 3 <br />. i <br />Q 788 PRESHWATER POUNDATION <br />(cont.) <br />m <br />, i-': .V <br />'i-' <br />Mu <br />im. <br />V <br />\..JflM <br />•C>■ ••>•:/:> ■ - <br />■•' ' -V <br />";!v’ <br />Shardlow stated that' they are including just the <br />portion of the property around the units which will be <br />landscaped and be maintained as part of the <br />University's ownership. Shardlow noted that not <br />unless the City approved the expansion of the <br />buildings could they build up to the lot lines. <br />Shardlow noted that that point will be conveyed in the <br />title as a negative easement over the property. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth asked what percentage of <br />the land is wetlands? <br />Geoff Martin stated it is about half and half. <br />Mabusth stated that this must be confirmed. <br />Norm Paurus asked what the zoning would be? <br />Chairman Rovegno stated that the current zoning is B-4 <br />and would be rezoned to LR-IB, a down zoning. <br />Elizabeth Close noted the floor plans of the duplexes. <br />Close noted that the houses and duplexes would be <br />camoflauged from the road by the landscaping. Close <br />noted two kitchens in the duplexes. <br />Norm Paurus asked if this design was layed out for the <br />single student. <br />Close stated yes because it would be University <br />students. <br />Kelley asked if the students were going to be allowed <br />cars? <br />Close stated that they hoped the students would walk to <br />work but that they did provide a parking area for <br />residents and visitors. <br />••i <br />■ <br />•J <br />i <br />i <br />,1i* <br />Shardlow noted that the landscape plan was designed as <br />a type of screening and they located the entrances <br />along to minimize disruption of natural vegetation. <br />Chairm'in Rovegno closed the public hearing at 8:20 <br />P.M. <br />Adams asked that the City consider waiving the park fee <br />because when this project is completed it will look <br />like a park and in a sense it seems unfair to take an <br />educational institution and charge a park fee. <br />Chairman Rovegno suggested that the Park Commission <br />review this development and waiving the park fee. <br />% -wrm