My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-1983 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
11-21-1983 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2023 3:24:11 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 2:58:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP NOVEMBER 21, 1983. PAGE 1 <br />[ (Attendance 7:00 p.m.The Planning Commission met on the above date. The <br />following members were present: Chairman Rovegno, <br />Sime, Adams, Goetten. Callahan arrived at 7:02. <br />Kelley arrived at 7:24. Adams arrived at 7:35. <br />McDonald was absent. City Attorney Malkerson <br />arrived at 7:03. Zoning Administrator Mabusth <br />represented the City staff. <br />SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS <br />REVIEW WITH CITY ATTORNEY <br />MALKERSON — PAGES 1—18 Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the subdivision <br />regulations set up the procedures and standards for <br />the applicant. Mabusth noted that the City can't use <br />metes and bounds like we used to, everything has to be a <br />plat. <br />■ '• V- <br />Chairman Rovegno asked how the City of Minnestrista is <br />doing with this code? <br />City Attorney Malkerson stated that they are doing <br />very well. <br />Callahan noted that with the City's current problem <br />concerning common ownership that the City should <br />specifiy in this subdivision code under section 67 <br />some additional language with common ownership. <br />Adams noted that on page 7 if a more accurate <br />definition of the City Council might be "the elected <br />representatives of City government". <br />City Attorney Malkerson stated that he would check the <br />statutes because the definitions in the subdivision <br />regulations must meet statuatory requirements. <br />Callahan noted on page 2 (item #4) instead of reading <br />“to protect the character in the social and economic <br />stability of all parts of the City.." since we always <br />seem to be talking about not all the parts of the City <br />but about the individual areas maybe it should read "to <br />protect the character of the land being subdivided as <br />well as surrounding land and social and economic <br />stability of...." Callahan stated that everytime <br />tney are making decisions about variances or <br />subdivision the Planning Commission takes into <br />account the surrounding property owners and/or <br />neighborhood. <br />Chairman Rovegno stated that in the subdivision <br />regulations that it states "Community Management <br />Plan" but the name of the City* s book is "Comprehensive <br />Management Plan". <br />■i -V <br />a.''
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.