My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-1983 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
09-19-1983 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2023 4:22:58 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 2:56:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- <br />C5 COMMISSION MEETING W SEPTEMBER 19, 1983 <br />•nie Planning Commission met on the above date The <br />Keliev^ CalTaha®“aa®'® P'«sent: Chairman Rovegno,Reiiey, Callahan, Adams, Goetten, McDonald and Qimas <br />tra“tor”!S:K'’%^°”'*"'‘ Present?lining Mm?iT|:trator Mabusth represented City staff. ^ <br />H' <br />m <br />mm <br />mm <br />£iii'• <br />:■■■■:■ •-r'.=. =‘V= i-.-: <br />■;;v,-:-v.V <br />; = ;■•=•*.■ <br />■ : ■■■/ ••.; •' ■• •• .•."•.../■'i; \- <br />■;. = •• •' <br />fmli <br />V' • •!.ir. ;: <br />:-■ <br />te-' <br />• '•. ■ 'r: •. <br />• . V-:-> ■ ■ <br />•... <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of <br />P«ier Ge"ral^”l publlcation^ca^'r Id Parten and Dan ::en were present. <br />"*’® Planning Commission the <br />?on?!f!f o'" 1 contains 1.2 acres. Lot 2 <br />1 fJu9V"ot "shoJtnne-.® <br />Hnes?e?hme‘d%‘?yco^oT^^^^^ <br />those lots can meet the requirements. <br />noted that he wished to keep the wild life dred on ono lot# <br />ronn?^^^ Shoreline didn't meet <br />developer could easily meet the requirements by moving the lot lines. <br />concern with future ownership on Lot <br />it wouidir*f^K ^ common ownership lot and <br />il buildable. Rovegno noted the need for <br />stan^rd easement to protect integrity of areastandard for zoning district. <br />Adams noted he was in favor of the subdivision as <br />proposed. Adams noted the road was in the ideal <br />shlft‘the"?‘*h''^“ moving the road north just the <br />feasible! ®"’® be <br />Mabusth noted the Gerald Parten's letter of 985 <br />Tonkawa Road stating that Mr. and Mrs. Parten did not <br />as\*he possible moving of the sewer line as long <br />as the City assured all financial responsibilitv for <br />any problems that may result with the new connection! <br />Callahan moved to approve Carl Parten's three lot <br />LR-lB finding all standards of the <br />thP»ro district have been maintained and that <br />available to extend sewer <br />f^iT^ ? additional units subject to thefollowing conditions; <br />"1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.