Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP JULY 18, 1983.Page 5 <br />Mabusth noted that there already was an existing <br />garage there. <br />Goetten noted that her direction at that time in 1982 <br />was to keep the garage on the house side of the street. <br />McDonald noted that the wetlands are very fragile to <br />build by and asked Mr. Fisk if Mr. Roth would consider <br />putting the the garage on the house side. <br />Mr . Fisk noted that Mr . Roth wanted it on the other side <br />and that there probably wasn't enough room on the house <br />side of the street. <br />Goetten noted that Mr. Roth was going by the direction <br />of the majority opinion of the Planning Commission but <br />it was not one she shared in. She noted that she still <br />has the same concern that she did in 1982. <br />McDonald would like to ask Mr. Roth if he would put it on <br />the house side. <br />Callahan asked if they moved the garage on the main <br />structure side, would they need a variance? <br />Mabusth stated that they would because of the 30* <br />setback requirement. <br />Callahan asked if the hardcover situation would be <br />better if the hardcover in question is over where the <br />house is and if it is closer to the wetlands as it now <br />is. <br />Mabusth stated that it probably would be. <br />Sime noted that there is an existing structure there <br />now approximately the size proposed now, and it would <br />seem that they have not changes anything that is <br />existing by approving his request in this location, <br />that he is just replacing one garage with another and <br />that it would remove an eyesore. <br />Mabusth noted that the proposed garage is a little <br />larger than the existing one. <br />Adams stated that since the applicant has complied <br />with the original recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission and that they should approve it, but to <br />allow a little more flexibility by maybe moving the <br />garage a few feet back. But that he would also invite <br />the applicant to consider building a garage on the <br />house side. He stated that this way the Planning <br />Commission would be giving the applicant the <br />flexibility to go ahead and do what the Planning <br />Commission stated at an earlier time.