Laserfiche WebLink
..w <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983.Page 15 <br />9 <br />SEIFERT (CONT) <br />ik. <br />:4 «W. ’-J <br />. V ..-:V <br />1764 CALVARY MEMORIAL <br />2420 DUNWOODY AVENUE <br />VARIANCE & CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT <br />WORK SESSION <br />Mr • Seifert explained that he is practising a new type <br />of medicine and working with no income producing <br />patients. He noted that he was given a grant to hire a <br />research associate and to help in his research. <br />Sime stated that he feels that Mr. Seifert has a moral <br />obligation to live up the agreement he made in 1980. <br />He noted that he would recommend that the building be <br />removed. <br />Goetten stated that Mr. Seifert did enter into an <br />agreement to remove the lakeshore cabin in return for <br />the addition that he was granted. She doesn't feel <br />there are any new hardships since 1980. She noted <br />that Mr. Seifert has had 3 years to remove the building <br />already. <br />Perry stated that there is morality that is due to <br />citizens from the City, that citizens being misled. <br />He noted that its not only the citizens in Orono that <br />have the moral obligation but also the City that has <br />the moral obligation.i <br />Callahan moved to recommend denial of the variance to <br />extend the deadline for removal of the lakeshore cabin <br />by July 1, 1983, per resolution no. 1165. Actually <br />the applicant is asking to change a contract that was <br />made between the applicant and the City. The two <br />letters opposing Dr. Seifert's request to be attached <br />to these minutes. <br />'•4 <br />■V <br />fI <br />Sime seconded. Vote: Ayes (3), Nays (0) <br />Adams & McDonald minority opinions - Adams stated that <br />they should give the applicant an extra year to remove <br />the building. McDonald felt the same. <br />Nick Real, applicant's architect, was present. Dale <br />Carpenter, Roger Creamer, Steve Martin and William <br />Scott McCurrey were also present. <br />Mabusth asked for the proposed addition size? She <br />noted that the Planning Commission wou>d probably like <br />to see a landscape plan at their next meeting. <br />Mr. Real stated that it was 81' x 104' . He noted that <br />that the proposed addition would seat 524 people. <br />Mr. Real stated that the one question that staff asked <br />about was the hardcover problem. He noted that they