My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-1983 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
06-20-1983 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2023 3:51:32 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 2:54:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 20, 1983 Page 6 <br />KARKELA CONT. <br />■■ <br />km <br />*%- <br />t r;a^‘^v:. <br />m <br />■. ' . • •■•r; ■ •. ••■• - ' <br />::..yX <br />O <br />Mabusth noted that the fishhouse wasn't calculated <br />into the hardcover calculations and that staff would <br />look into the problem. <br />Mabusth asked the applicant if he would have a problem <br />with a garage the size of 24* x 26'? <br />Karkela stated that this would be reasonable. <br />Goetten notid that the main concern of the Plannin, <br />Commission was not the size of the garage, but cm <br />total hardcover that would be added onto the property. <br />She noted that the applicant would have to reduce some <br />of the paving on the property. <br />Callahan asked the Planning Commission what the <br />justification for the additional hardcover proposed <br />because the applicant wanted an office with a deck. <br />Lynn Adams asked what type of business the applicant <br />was in? <br />Karkela stated that he invests in real estate and that <br />in the past he has tried to work out of the home. <br />Goetten noted that this was then a home occupation use <br />for the proposed garage. <br />Mabusth informed the applicant that this was a single <br />family residential area and businesses may only be <br />operated from the main dwelling with a special permit. <br />Goetten performed a Planning Commission poll as to how <br />each member felt about this application. <br />Kelley noted that the big issue was the severe increase <br />in hardcover and the size of the garage should be 24* x <br />24', because of the hardcover problem. <br />Adams was in favor of a garage the size of 24' x 26* and <br />had no problem with the deck as long as there was a <br />tradeoff with the other hardcover on the property. <br />Callahan stated that the applicant had good intentions <br />by moving the old garage out of the right of way and that <br />24* X 26' would be fine. <br />McDonald agreed with Lynn Adams on a 24* x 26' garage <br />and had no problem with the deck on the second floor. <br />Sime had reservations about creating office space <br />above a garage. He noted that this could turn into a <br />guest house in the future and that they could be <br />creating a future problem. <br />Vi <br />1 <br />JSaa
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.