Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP MARCH 21, 1983 <br />y /MM - ' <br />> V • VvV'‘j|- <br />mm <br />Olson stated no, that the trees were within the <br />part of Bracket Avenue right of way which staff <br />recommends against vacating but that the City has <br />no intention of cutting them or expanding the <br />parking lot. As to the trees being on Gregory's <br />property, Olson noted the Gregory's 1976 survey <br />in the file showed this area as right of way, and <br />also the Gregory's existing fence line running <br />down the edge of the right of way west of the trees <br />separating them from the Gregory land. <br />Chairman Roveo7,> closed the public hearing at <br />9:15 P.N. to be continued after the public <br />hearing that is scheduled for 9:00 P.M. <br />At 9:30 P.N., Chairman Rovegno opened Planning <br />Commission discussion on the Nolly's Corner <br />vacation application. <br />Berg r^uested vacation of all of Bracket Avenue, <br />with any road right of way then rededicated in the <br />current platting process. <br />Planning Commission Member Sime stated that he is <br />not in favor of vacating anything. Planning <br />Commission Member McDonald also stated that she <br />is not in favor of any vacation. Planning <br />Commission Member Goetten stated that she is in <br />favor of the vacation and does not want any <br />parking lot at that location. Planning <br />Commission Member Callahan stated that he is in <br />favor of a partial vacation. Chairman Rovegno <br />stated that he is in favor of vacating the entire <br />area. <br />Chairman Rovegno asked Berg the status of the <br />proposal set out in his February 24, 1983 letter. <br />Mr. Berg—we want to agree with the City but the <br />Gregorys do not want to do anything without the <br />approval of their neighbors. <br />Olson —I believe that we have agreement between <br />my recommendation and Mr. Berg's proposal, <br />except for the amount of railroad land to be used <br />for parking and whether the so-called woods is to <br />be public or private. This is really a minor <br />problem that should be negotiable and agreeable <br />in everyone's best interests. We both want to <br />improve control of the area and to protect the <br />neighboring property values. No one wants to <br />see use of the area increased. <br />wm