Laserfiche WebLink
• ^ <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP MARCH 21, 1983 Page <br />mm <br />mm'wmmsmmm <br />:?-iy--r:.W^M <br />..:V^.' ■ <br />mm <br />il# '*d ’- ^-». .;jll <br />Mr William Gregory stated that they had a pl*/* <br />ci;se the area! miund It. and landscape it to <br />beautify the area. ^ ^ <br />Mr Moen stated that the blind curve is an <br />inappropriate place to have laKeshore acce <br />usag.o. <br />Robert Schmitt, 1475 Shoreline Drive, asked that <br />rithe public has been using it I®"? do <br />they a right to continue? He stated that his <br />S^;?y?s" IV'AIV <br />rera^n" tra‘’r«"s^ou\d bV'^ol'i'c.d SSd »«i«.ln^ <br />so that the public can use it in an order y <br />fashion. <br />M»rv Rivets. 1442 Shoreline Drive, stated that <br />Se^puWic doernot seem to know the difference <br />that her business has had many ^.“thtststeming trom persons that she has h»d to chas <br />away from her property (Windward Marine). <br />Berg stated that he agreed with the co""*"ts of <br />^uSircV^^^-rin <br />of City Council action, the Gregorys are <br />to give up their shoreline. <br />Mr. Berg stated that his clients compromise offer <br />stemmed from a ‘'l/V. ‘-V int.rprSw^ <br />tion of Malkerson*s conversation, <br />felt that there were ways “hat* thtbe reached so that we could complete tne <br />subdiwslon and land registration. <br />compromise, Malkerson felt that <br />review would be delayed and so would <br />work It took me a long time to respond to <br />Malkerson’s proposal 'i'j*J|,„*®SridM.Gregory's proposal *s thought since <br />II ’’star\‘e‘d" o«'th^hts of <br />‘t/raltC t"e 9" rrrdU‘"”T;.e Jr^fle is <br />ShSt w. have^otte’n a “tXu nl“ <br />nuisance. The City is legally able to vacate the <br />area.