Laserfiche WebLink
"'k <br />•* r'w 'ms ,V.i . <br />#lafinln9 Commission Meeting of January 17, 1983 <br />FLOWAGB ft CONSERVATION <br />EASEMENT - «653 <br />Scott Goldsmith <br />245 Old Crystal Bay Rd. <br />w ^1 Page 2 <br />«. . ‘ *.1S ■ »• ■ <br />I '> <br />Hrh^L. v^SB <br />■.v'".;', ./ u <br />'-■ ’2 <br />I <br />Scott Goldsmith was present to explain to the Planning <br />Commission his reasons for amending portions of the <br />flowage and conservation easements for his subdivision <br />at 245 Old Crystal Bay Road. <br />m <br />'■'•'■■S'? ■' :,. : •hJLLu <br />Member Goetten moved. Member McDonald seconded, to <br />recommend approval of the amendments to the standard <br />Flowage and Conservation Easement, except for the two <br />noted in the Zoning Administrator's memo dat?4 January <br />11, 1983, as follows: <br />i'S# <br />IK <br />i <br />tpwm <br />C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other <br />natural material or substance shall be moved or removed <br />from the Land and there shall be no dredging or excava­ <br />tion of any nature whatsoever or any change of the <br />topography of the Land without the written consent of <br />Grantee, which consent shall not be unreasonably <br />withheld. <br />m-"' ’Vi <br />«r ■ r. <br />2. Grantors hereby grant. Quit Claim and convey to <br />Grantee, for so long as this easement for natural <br />flowage purpoies is necessarvT a perpetual flowage <br />easement and right andk privilege to trespass with water <br />mmriI-over and upon any or all of the land, providing that <br />such easement, right and privilege shall not include <br />. .4 <br />ariificlal increase, redirection or channelling c? <br />waters. <br />W.Motion, Ayes (5) - Mays <br />FRBLININARY^SUB- <br />DIVZ8Z0M - #715 <br />Victor Norton <br />3580 Bayside Road <br />m <br />Pfe:3Sif?S-' ^. <br />Mr. ft Mrs. Norton and Mr. Balgaard were present. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained this new type <br />of division. Member Goetten inquired how many feet of <br />lakeshore was involved? Mabusth stated 4004*. Member <br />Kelley questioned the proposed sise of the newly created <br />lot. Norton stated that that was all that Balgaard <br />needed. Discussion included the location of the new <br />lot line, the possible encroachment of neighbor's dock <br />to the south, and the possibility of another division. <br />Die Planning Commission asked Norton to divide the lot <br />in half so to discourage any greater use of the shore­ <br />line on a Bay that has severe environmental limitations. <br />LK, ‘ 'xi <br />Chairman Rovegno moved. Member Sims seconded, to deny <br />the subdivision request of Victor Norton, 3580 Bayside <br />Road, due to the density of Stubbs Bay, the potential <br />for a future subdivision is there, and to protect the <br />public health and welfare, <br />(Continued) <br />-.Ab.,i J!