Laserfiche WebLink
8 on lir&:-S:'.,•V*' -.-s-'' : •. . •• V'- <br />Rovegno stated that it is not a designated we <br />there is no f lowage across it and it is not a w pond • <br />Tim Aoanis stated that it would cl^n up the a <br />would enhance the surrounding lots. <br />Kelley moved to approve the conditional uJ^pei <br />develofmient of pond and excessive grading. <br />m <br />•80S oMt mMiu.r <br />3844 anniT avbm « <br />vUrvIl: i. <br />J <br />Ada^s seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />\ <br />Gary Hunnally was present. Zoning Admin <br />Mabusth stated that this is a renewal variai <br />I' ; ' :'i <br />McDonald moved to recommend approval of a rene <br />area, lot width and hardcover variance based <br />following findings: <br />iiMi <br />existing abutting lakesMre <br />proposed h^ setback area •• limiting lake \ <br />m 2. No adjacent land availabl^ <br />^ • <br />r. =• <br />: ~ jgp <br />3. Proposed plan cttts down on land to be distii property. <br />mm mi 4. The proposed application has been appro <br />Council in 1979 and 1981 - sane codes were in e <br />based on the following condi <br />nfiiak <br />I. Open deck roust meet tlie 75* setback iakeshore.'i;*. <br />limited to 2253 square fe <br />nm-i-mJi. <br />3. Prior to issuance of building permit, sh( <br />existing structure must be torn down. <br />I- ■ : <br />smomsioM rbgoutioms <br />Kelley seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0).I', a <br />ms <br />*> • <br />i-r <br />mmm <br />L ''-'.' - ' .■ :i. . .i <br />stated that the public roads and private <br />section should be amended. Kelley asked how c <br />City maintain some deadend streets and not o1 <br />Kelley stated that they are benefitting some b <br />other taxpayers. <br />•f.X* <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the Ci <br />to service within its budget and that if the Cit <br />to take over all the private roads around it wou] <br />huge and expensive task.