Laserfiche WebLink
MINDTBS OF THE PIANlilNG COMNlSSIOII MEETING HELD OCTOBER 22, 1984. PAGE 8 <br />Callahan stated that the Planning Conunission needs to <br />see the overall plan for both lots. <br />Kelley stated that both lots have hardcover problems. <br />Kelley stated that he too would like to see plans for <br />the whole development. <br />Rovegno stated that if they can build two houses <br />meeting all the hardcover and other codes of the City# <br />then he could look upon the application favorably. <br />Don Peterson stated that this is a buildable lot which <br />has been platted according to the building codes at the <br />time it was platted. Peterson stated that sewer was <br />subsequently put in and this lot was assessed as a <br />bui3dable lot. Petersen stated that the water main <br />was subsequently put in and again this lot was assessed <br />as a buildable lot. Peterson stated that Mrs. <br />Johnstone has paid taxes on this lot as if it was a <br />buildable lot. Peterson stated that the City has <br />changed the rules since this has been platted to <br />require new subdivisions to meet the code# but does the <br />City have the right to go back in and change the rules on <br />someone that already has a platted lot under the old <br />subdivision rules. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the special <br />assessments on a piece of property never in and of <br />themselves declares the lot a buildable lot. Mabusth <br />stated that the applicant was charged two lateral <br />assessments because of the lineal footage of the <br />property. Mabusth stated that the value of that lot <br />is never assessed as a buildable lot# but assessed as a <br />vacant lot as part of the improvements for the existing <br />house. Mabusth stated that the assessor can break <br />down those special assessments. <br />Charles Pyle of 1820 Shadywood Road stated that he is <br />concerned about the division of the lot. Pyle stated <br />that everything on the south side of this lot is larger <br />than this proposed lot. Pyle stated that there are <br />several large trees that may have to be removed that <br />concern him. <br />Adams stated that the fact that the house :s on one lot <br />and the garage is on the other lot creates a problem <br />and suggests to him that it has been treated for years <br />as a single lot. Adams stated that if this lot was <br />platted before the City codes were changed he might <br />feel differently. <br />Mrs . Johnstone stated that she pays $1 # 500 in taxes for <br />the lot with the existing house, and $1,400 for the <br />other vacant lot with the garage.