Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
f- <br />minutes of the planning commission meeting held NOVEMBER 19, 1994 PAGE 8 <br />#874 BARTH/JOHNSTONE Rovegno questioned Adam's opposition, referring to <br />a similiar situation in which a larger piece of <br />land would be subdivided with a house on one lot <br />and a garage serving that house on another. Would <br />you disallow that subdivision? <br />McDonald agreed with Adams stating that we have got <br />to be strict in this matter to protect Lake <br />Minnetonka. <br />Motion, Ayes (1), Nays (5). <br />McDonald moved, Adams seconded, to recommend denial <br />subject to the following findings: <br />1. The lots were used as one property, house on <br />one lot and garage serving house on the other lot <br />thus indicating that they had planned to use it as <br />one homosite. <br />2. There is no sewer stub and plant charge has not <br />been paid. <br />3. The lot areas proposed are significantly less <br />than the average lot area in the neighborhood. <br />4. This could set a precedence in that 10 to 15 new <br />building sites might have to be allowed to be <br />created from existing common substandard ownership <br />lots if this is approved in this zoning district. <br />5. A side yard setback variance for the existing <br />house would have been necessary. <br />Motion, Aye (5), Nay (1).