My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-1984 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
11-19-1984 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2023 2:56:48 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 1:26:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
n <br />MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSIION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 2 <br />#877 RICHARD PERRY <br />Jk <br />Mnbusth noted that there are no problems with <br />setbacks for the existing structures. The lot line <br />changes have absolutely nothing to do with the <br />setback lines or required building envelopes. <br />Kelley inquired about the access to the lot and the <br />width. <br />White replied that they have a permanent easement <br />of 20’. <br />Phleger stated that there will be a 20' easement <br />which the Vihites have now but for clarification <br />when the deeds are exchanged it will be again noted <br />for the record. The easement is across the Perry <br />property. <br />Rovegno asked that the plat map be clarified. <br />Mrs. White said the easement was created because <br />the Old 87 Road used to run right in front of <br />Perry's driveway. There i s an aerial view map that <br />their surveyor,Tom Burquist, found at the court <br />house that verifies the easement. <br />Phleger noted that the descriptions, which look <br />forebodingon the certificate survey, will not <br />increase the legal descriptions for the properties. <br />The White property will be described as its present <br />description excluding anything west of that lot. <br />Kelley questioned the fill that was going in there <br />and Mabusth explained that that has already been <br />reviewed by the city in a previous conditional use <br />permit review. <br />Rovegno stated that we have to make sure the White <br />house maintains road access. <br />Adams moved, McDonald seconded recommendation of <br />approval of the Perry/White application of the lot <br />line rearrangement finding no negative affects on <br />the existing building envelopes. Approval is <br />subject to the following conditions; <br />1. Parcel <br />homestead . <br />A is to be combined with White <br />2. Parcel B is to be combined with Perry <br />homestead . <br />Motions, Ayes (6), Nays (0).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.