11-19-1984 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 18 1881 RRUTZIG HOMES 5. That the additional hardcover is not necessary, to maintain a substantial property right. 6. This problem of hardcover was brought on by the applicant. Krutzig clarified that he was not aware of hardcover, he had his plans done according to the setbacks, structural engineer had worked on the plans, and all those plans had to be submitted at one time. At the time they were submitted was the time that Gaffron called and said we have a hardcover problem. Krutzig stated that he had at that time already spent $7500. He stated he had the option to drop his plans or continue on the basis that he apply for hardcover variance. Krutzig also asked if a pool is considered hardcover. Rovegno clarified that a poo 1 is not considered hardcover, the deck is but the pool has its own closed recirculating movment. It doesn't drain, it collects. Motion, Aye (6), Nay (0). FENCE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Mabusth clarified that she would like the input sheets back to her by December 10, 1984. ,lv^ Rovegno questioned how long grading has to sit there before it becomes existing grade? I feel if we have a reference point that you know wi 1 1 be consistent and then setting a height from that point. Rovegno feels that the fence issue should be addressed as a total case including commercial and residentia 1. Mabusth noted that Council asked that only the residential fence ordinance be looked at. They also asked that controls bo considered for privacy fences that are constructed as accessory structures. Another issue is protecting the view of neighbors. All of the sample codes submitted for this review deal with protection of adjoining property not protection for the person on the other side of a major thoroughfare.