My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-18-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
02-18-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 4:26:37 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 3:03:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date: <br />Subject <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Jeanne A, Mabusthr Zoning Administrator <br />February 12, 1986 <br />#1009 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Blvd. - <br />Variance to Ordinance 13, Second Series, moratorium for <br />properties located within Highway 12 Corridor. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Application <br />List of Property Owners <br />Ordinance 13 <br />Planning Commission Minutes of 12/16/85 <br />Council tabled all action on variance application #10000 at <br />their meeting of January 13th because the original plans sub <br />mitted by the applicant were not consistent with the sign im <br />provements referenced by applicant at the Council meeting. Mr. <br />Wear was asked to submit a revised plan for Council's <br />consideration. <br />Staff has also been advised that Mr. Wear's application for <br />a variance to the sign ordinances also requires a variance to the <br />moratorium. Please note Section 6 of that ordinance that also <br />lists the necessary findings that must be made for a <br />recommendation of approval. <br />1. The proposal is not in conflict with the intent of the <br />Comprehensive Community Management Plan. <br />2. The proposal is compatible with the zoning and official <br />control amendments being considered by the City. <br />3. The proposed does not adversely impact the health, <br />safety and welfare of the community. <br />Based on the Planning Commission’s findings of December 16, <br />1985 (Exhibit D) it would appear that you can make the necessary <br />findings to approve the applicant's request for a variance to <br />moratorium Ordinance No. 13, Second Series. <br />It is hoped that by the time the implementation of the <br />directives of the planning study are realized that the commercial <br />sign ordinance will be amended such that the needs of a mixed use <br />facility will be addressed. At this time we cannot determine if <br />Mr. Wear's sign meets standards yet to be addressed. <br />m
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.