My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-18-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
02-18-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 4:26:37 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 3:03:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
k I ■ <br />Add1i€C1 <br />ManaScmenl <br />Science. Inc. <br />3740 <br />IDS TOWER <br />Minneapolis. <br />Minnesota <br />55402 <br />(612)338-0501 <br />Planning Caimission <br />CITY CF ORONO <br />P. 0. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />- - - <br />V. >\\ty ‘ v\ \ _ _ _ ♦V \ \ \l _V <br />February 12, 1986 <br />In respmse to the enclosed notice concerning vciriances on the <br />property located at 1710 Shac^o/ood Road vdiich abuts ny property <br />to the north, I have the following oexments to make. <br />I certainly have no qualms about property iirprovement, but I vould <br />strongly urge you not to cdlcxf/ any additional structure or h£u?d- <br />oover within 75 feet of the lakeshore, because I think tliat house, <br />like mine at 1690 Shac^wood Road, is already infringing in that 75 <br />foot protected area. <br />Likewise, because the lots in that general airea, including theirs <br />and mine, are relatively narrow lots, I would also urge you not to <br />deviate from the 10 foot side y2u:d setbacks for either structure or <br />hardcover. While I can't give exact measurements at this time, I <br />suspect both structures 2ure pretty close to the 10 foot side yard <br />limit on the property line already. <br />Since these lots in this area are already pretty small in terms of <br />square footage, I think you ought to look pretty hard at any request <br />for additioncil hardcover other than reasonable additions to the <br />house itself on the west side, in other words, any request for <br />additional driveway, peurking space, additional garage space, etc. <br />should be denied because it will infringe on what I suspect is hard <br />cover that already exceeds the permissible amount. <br />I certainly don't mean to pose a problem for ny neighbor in his <br />attenpts to inprove his preperty, but on the other hand, if he wants <br />to do it he should do it within the existing rules of the game for <br />lakeshore property. I'd also appreciate it if he would keep his <br />dogs in his own yeurd. That, more tlian anything else since they <br />have moved in, would pose a real problem for tlie family vdio will <br />eventually buy ny property at 1690 Shadywood Road. It might be a <br />good idea to be sure he's aware of what the leash law is for that <br />area also. <br />Sincerely, <br />oc: Jeanne A. Mabustli <br />Enclosure: Itotice concerning variances
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.