My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-18-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
02-18-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 4:26:37 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 3:03:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r' <br />1 <br />Date: <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />February 13, 1986 <br />Subject: #1006 Dale & Chris Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road <br />Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-IC, 1/2 Acre <br />Application ~ Request hardcover variance <br />addition and attached garage. <br />to construct home <br />Existing Hardcover <br />Proposed Hardcover <br />Existing Hardcover <br />Proposed Hardcover <br />0-75' = 17.5% <br />0-75* = 19.5% <br />75-250* * 27.3% <br />(conceptual only),75-250* •-= 33.3% <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />Survey With Conceptual Sketch of Proposal <br />The applicant, Mr. Lindner, is acting as agent for Chris and <br />Dale Palm, who are purchasing the property. The proposal is to <br />construct a small addition and attached garage. The applicant <br />has submitted a survey showing the existing harocover, and has <br />submitted plans for the addition and garage, but has only given <br />us a conceptual idea of driveway and sidewalk plans. Staff has <br />sketched (on the survey) a rendition of a driveway with backup <br />apron and front sidewalk, for discussion purposes. Applicant was <br />requested to submit a more finalized plan but has not as of this <br />writing. <br />Note that the proposed addition will not encroach into the <br />average lakeshore setback, but does constitute additional <br />structure in the 0-75* setback area. Also note that removal of <br />the existing detached garage will make the structures on the <br />property more conforming from a setback standpoint. <br />Staff suggests that the Planning Commission request more <br />defined plans from the applicant as to the driveway and sidewalks <br />proposed, or, as an alternative course of action, consider the <br />proposal as sketched on the survey, and determine whether any <br />hardships are present that justify granting the requested <br />variances.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.