Laserfiche WebLink
The code also provides that the upper 24 inches upon <br /> which a mound is to be constructed have a percolation <br /> rate no slower than 120 minutes per inch and the <br /> maximum allowable slope is based on the percolation <br /> rate in that 24 inches. Tests 2 and 4 were taken to <br /> check that this requirement was met and that maximum <br /> slopes were not exceeded. The average of the 33 mpi <br /> rate measured in Test 2 and the 11 mpi rate measured in <br /> Test 4 is 22 mpi and where that average rate is faster <br /> than 30 mpi the code provides that up to 12% slope is <br /> allowable compared with the 11.5% that you measure from <br /> our contours. <br /> We note further that page E-8 of the On Site Sewage <br /> Treatment Manual suggests that recent research and <br /> analysis indicate that basal width and not slope is the <br /> important consideration in such designs. <br /> It would have been helpful to enumerate these tests and <br /> show calculation of the average to avoid confusion. <br /> Our draftsman plotted the location of Perc. Test No. 2 <br /> on the drawing and it is indicated by a dark dot as are <br /> the other tests but he failed to copy the label from <br /> the work drawing and we did not catch his omission upon <br /> review of the rather congested site plan. <br /> We note that during an initial site evaluation on a <br /> difficult site with limited space, the ultimate <br /> location of the treatment area may not be readily <br /> apparent. The evaluator may have to use his best <br /> estimate of where the treatment area may be located and <br /> then sample in a way that gives him an overall feel for <br /> the percolation rates on site so that he is in a <br /> position to estimate the percolation rate no matter <br /> where the treatment area may finally be placed. If <br /> after a final placement of the proposed mound area is <br /> made, the location of the tests taken and the <br /> variability of the tests are such that testing under <br /> the actual mound site might produce results so <br /> different that they would materially affect the design, <br /> then these additional tests should be taken. In this <br /> instance, to render our basal area inadequate, we would <br /> have to find percolation rates greater than 31 mpi <br /> under the mound. We didn't feel and continue to feel <br /> that this is not at all likely in light of the tests <br /> taken and thus did not test further. <br />