My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
12-16-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:25:58 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:13:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 18, 1985. PAGE 3 <br />#987 BAUMAN continued <br />Mr. Bauman stated that he felt that the proposed plan <br />conforms with the average setback based on all the area <br />properties. <br />i <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron pointed out that the <br />average setback is determined by the two adjacent properties <br />only and, as shown in Exhibit E, does not conform with the <br />average setback. <br />Gertrude Noelting, 1060 Tonkawa Road, was present and stated <br />the proposed pool would be "ugly" from an outside view and <br />felt it would diminish the value of her property. She stated <br />that there is space to place the pool in another area. <br />Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, was present and stated the <br />pool would encroach upon their sight line and would effect <br />their property value. She invited the Planning Commission <br />to visit her home to view the sight problem. <br />Taylor stated an aesthetic landscape plan should be <br />submitted. <br />Chairman Callahan stated that elevation plan should also be <br />submitted. <br />Commission discussed various options for placement of deck <br />and pool building. <br />The Commission generally felt that the hardcover trade-off <br />variance would not be a problem. <br />There were no other persons present to speak on this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to <br />table this matter pending landscape, site, pool building, <br />and elevation plans. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />#988 JAMBS B. MBRTBS <br />3237 CASCO CIRCLE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:52-9:15 <br />Jim and Ruthmary Mertes were present for this matter. <br />Chairman Callahan explained the request for renewal of a lot <br />width and lot area variance, which was previosly granted to <br />owner, Douglas Smith, in February 1984 per Resolution #1607 <br />Doug Smith was present for this matter and stated that the <br />applicant's, Mr. & Mrs. James Mertes, bought this property <br />contingent upon renewal of these variances. <br />Jane & Jack Remien, 3235 Casco Circle, were present for this <br />matter. Jane Remien stated that they were unhappy about <br />this because the lot is too small, as is their lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.