My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
12-16-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:25:58 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:13:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PAGE 2 <br />he hous <br />etback. <br />red bu ‘ <br />teeded ti <br />eighbor,! <br />i presen <br />the siz^ <br />be used <br />lling t< <br />o build <br />[cover bj <br />te planii <br />table tN <br />^nceptua <br />based oil <br />0. <br />e setbacl <br />3 pool. <br />om Jurge: <br />e setback <br />loted a: <br />t on th <br />tter. Mr <br />ated tha <br />.ch shoul <br />be store <br />CITY OP ORONO <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />ZONING FILE NO. 98 3 <br />NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/21/85 <br />TO: Walter & Marilyn Pemberton <br />4567 Gaywood Road <br />Minnetonka, MN 55343 <br />TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance <br />Date of Meeting; 11/18/85 <br />COPIES TO: <br />Vote:For 0 Against <br />Planning Commission recommends the following: <br />XX Tabled: For reasons noted below <br />NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />Subject to submittal of a ravised plan under the following <br />conditions; <br />1. (Granting lot area and lot width variances.) <br />2. 5* setback to Fegers lot for garage (tuckunder). <br />3. 10* setback for remainder of house. <br />4. Maximum 0-75* hardcover of 20%. <br />5. Maximum 75-250* hardcover of 52.3%. <br />6. Limit fill in C-75* to only that necessary to accomodate <br />garage and driveway backup aprcn. <br />7. If necessary to accomodate driveway, remove portions of right <br />side deck. <br />8. General Planning Commission direction was to meet the average <br />setback with the front 8* deck. If front of house is in line <br />with Fegers house, a 4* wide front deck would meet the average <br />setback. The question remains, what is the point at which we <br />measure the front setback? The edge of pavement? The edge of <br />the actual road easement? How wide is the County Road easement <br />on your property? (Note 8* deck as proposed is 31* from pave <br />ment, 18-19* from assumed R.O.W. line between adjacent lot pins, <br />and 1-2* closer to road than Lamont*s house.) This is certain to <br />be an item for discrssion. <br />Finally, to confirm, we will meet in this office to discuss the <br />next steps at 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, November 26, 1985.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.