11-18-1985 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#761 - Douglas H. Sitiith November 10, 1983 Page 3 mg ting 1. No available land - lots are developed on both sides 2. Sewer and water are available 3. House and improvements to be constructed without need for additional variances H 4. Applicant purchased property not knowing the ordinance limitations on development of Lot 18 5. Variance being granted despite the common ownership issue 6. By granting this variance, there will be no negative effect on the public health, safety and welfare V 7. By granting this variance, it is consistent with the development of the area 8. By granting this variance, there should be no need for future hardcover and setback variances 9. Planning Comjtiission would like to note that the garage is a non- conforming structure and subject to all pertinent ordinances 10. The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property 11. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district and which said land is located 12. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant 13. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the zoning code 14. That the granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty If Council cannot act to recommend approval, you have two alternatives of action: 1. Adopt minority opinion of the Planning Commission and vote to deny the variance application of Doug Smith for a lot held in common ownership that is 5,032 sq. ft. or 23% under required 21,780 sq. ft. or 100% in area and 45 feet or 45% under required 100' or 100% in lot width based on the following findings: