My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:24:12 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:09:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING OP THE ORONO COUNCIL, NOVEMBER 14, 1983.PAGE 5 <br />#761 DOUGLAS SMITH Mr. Tuthill ststGd thst he h3s sold his hous6 ds it <br />stands and that a lot line rearrangement wouldn't be <br />possible. <br />Councilmember Hammerel noted that it was not unanimous <br />approval by the Planning Commission and noted <br />Callahan's comments which essentially meant that the <br />common ownership issue had to be dealt with first. <br />Councilmember Grabek suggested setting the date <br />earlier for resolution of the common ownership issue <br />from January 1 to their December 12 meeting. Grabek <br />noted that it is not fair to the citizens of Orono by <br />delaying this common ownership issue. <br />Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember Adams <br />seconded, to table Douglas Smith's application <br />pending more information and that the Smith <br />application be brought back to Council on December 12 <br />for action based on the additional information. <br />Grabek asked for the following information to be <br />submitted: <br />1. Additional information on the sewer and taxation <br />o'" sewer units. <br />2. What percentile this lot falls into with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />3. How mortgages are held in common ownership <br />situations? <br />4. If this lot has a sewer stub available and how it <br />was treated in the past. <br />5. Whether or not there was any tax abatement <br />proceedings. <br />6.Whether or not there was any correspondence from <br />the present owner about the status of this lot, <br />whether or not it was buildable. <br />7.In applicants letter, it states that similar <br />variances have been granted and that the appl icant <br />should identify which ones those were so that <br />staff can investigate those to see if a precedent <br />has been set. <br />Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that all other <br />work on zoning applications would have to cease until <br />after the first of the year in order to allow adequate <br />staff time cn the common ownership issue.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.