My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985 Planning Packets
>
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:24:12 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:09:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO:Dick Picnson, City Administrator <br />FROM: <br />DATB: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Hank Muliich, Zoninn Administrator <br />#161 <br />August 12, 1976 <br />Frank Slawson - 3580 North Shore Drive <br />Variance - Lot Area 5 Width to Add to Ibusc on Existing <br />Non-Conforming Lot and Lakeshore Setback <br />Kim or Eileen Ha»fkinson are the oivners of the property. A though the property is <br />in a sewered area, the sewer has never been connected. I don’t know if the house <br />was ever used as a year-round residence as it appears to be somevdiat small for <br />that (696 sq. ft.). <br />Although this district is zoned 1/2 acre, this parcel and lots 6 and 8 on either <br />side of it are extremely small. In fact, tlie area of the larger portion of the <br />subject lot is only 7,550 sq. ft. in area (about 1/6 acre). This lot is 50’ wide <br />itfMrather than the 100' required. <br />The existing dwelling is only about 12' from the existing neighbor's home to the <br />southwest. If the proposed addition is approved, tliis setback \\rould also be only <br />about 12' from tlie existing house to the northeast. <br />Part of the existing house lies xnthin the 75’ lakeshore setback requirement. <br />Part of the newly proposed addition would also lie witliin the 75' setback require <br />ment. <br />I believe an addition like this would result in extremely dense conditions. <br />>fr. Slawson is making tliis proposal as I beliew he is interested in purdiasing <br />the property providing he obtains Council approval of the variances requested. <br />PLANNING OONNISSION MEETING - Septenfcer 7, 1976 <br />Recomimded denial because the proposed addition would result in extremely dense <br />conditions (12' between main structures on both sides of subject residence and <br />part of the proposed addition would be built within the 75' lakeshore setback <br />requireinent resulting in additional non-filtered stoim water runoff into Lake <br />Minnetonka. <br />COUNCIL MEETING - September 13, 1976 <br />Denied variance but suggested revised proposal could be submitted for recons ider:?.Lte,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.