My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
10-21-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:28:51 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:04:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />TO:Planning Commission Members <br />PROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE: October 17, 1985 <br />SUBJ: #986 George Rovegno, 2010 Shoreline Drive <br />Variance <br />Update Memo ~ <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />City Administrator's Memo 6/5/85 <br />Council Minutes 6/10/85 <br />The City Administrator has advised that at the Council Meeting of June <br />10, 1985, Council's interpretation of newly amended Section 10,22 <br />Subdivision 1 is to be interpreted as follows: (see Exhibit B) <br />"that fence or walls 3-1/2 feet or less within 75 feet of <br />the lakeshore are permitted." <br />The variance sought would not be for placement but for height of fence. <br />42 inches allowed <br />60 inches + existing <br />Reveiw of previous recommendations suggested to applicant - <br />At various meetings with the applicant, staff has suggested the <br />temporary use of a cabanna during the summer months to provide privacy. <br />The applicant did not accept this offer. Staff has placed laths along <br />the setback line that would provide adequate distance from the road and <br />the intersection. Staff has advised the applicant that as long as the <br />fence does not exceed a height of 3-1/2 feet above the crown of the road <br />that this would satisfy the intent of the code. The applicant would <br />except this offer and has agreed to trim the fence back to the required 3 <br />feet height within any portion located 30 feet from the intersection <br />point. <br />The applicant has advised that the City has not placed the posts along <br />the south side as promised; posts have been placed along Shoreline <br />Drive's right-of-way. I have also been advised that guard rails were <br />also to be included with the post installation. Staff will recommend <br />to the Council that posts with guard rails be installed along the <br />southern lot line of the access to deter trespassers. <br />Per Section 10.03 (B) Subdivision 6 Combination of Separated Parcels <br />Prohibited. Staff would also recommend that since the applicant's <br />property has been divided by the intersecting roadway (plat of County <br />Rd. 15), the lakeshore parcel can no longer claim any connection or <br />credit for principal structure on non riparian portion of property. <br />As in the Shaver/Tearse application, applicant must apply for a <br />variance to maintain an accessory structure on a lot that does not <br />contain a principal structure.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.