My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
10-21-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:28:51 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:04:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Planning Commision Members <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Admistrator <br />September 9, 1985 <br />#959 George E. Johnson, 365 North Old Crystal Bay Road <br />- Variance <br />ZONING DISTRICT - RR - IB, 2-acre Single Family Rural Residential. <br />APPLICATION - Request to construct a 1620 square foot pole barn for <br />storage of vehicles and equipment, (maximum allowed accessory <br />structure is 1000 s.f.) <br />LIST OF EXHIBITS <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Survey <br />E - Construction Plans <br />The applicant is requesting to construct a 30' x 54' pole barn <br />for storage of vehicles and equipment. The property consists of 5.0 <br />acres in a 2-acre zone. <br />The proposed building will be located 150' from the south lot <br />line, 126.5 feet from the north lot line, approximately 225 feet from <br />the east lot line, approximately 300 feet from the west lot line, and <br />114 feet from the existing house. The building is not intended to <br />house animals, so it is not subject to the 150' setback requirements. <br />It obviously meets the 10' side setback requirement. <br />The Building Inspector notes that an accessory structure of <br />this size must meet certain building code standards which will apply. <br />Note that one of the reasons we restrict accessory structure <br />to 1000 square feet is that they tend to attract other miscellaneous <br />type uses in residential zones. Any recommendation for approval <br />should suggest language restricting the use to private residential <br />storage, and suggest the following conditions; <br />1. No plumbing may be installed in the building. <br />2. This building may never be used as a second dwelling unit. <br />3. This building may not be used as a stable or to house <br />animals, because it is less than 150'fromthe north lot <br />line. Use for animal housing would require a variance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.