Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #935 <br />July 12, 1985 <br />Page 2 <br />No actual design plans for the pond itself have been submitted, <br />and the City Engineer has not reviewed the site. A recommendation for <br />approval should be conditioned on the City Engineer's review and <br />approval. Interestingly, the complainant called today and withdrew <br />the complaint, noting that their concerns no long exist. (Complainant <br />wishes to remain anonymous.) <br />You have in your paclcet a copy of the overall relandscaping plans <br />for this golf course. Staff suggested that the applicant bring these <br />in so that a "blanlcet" approval could be given for the individual <br />small projects, which include extending certain tees, tree planting, <br />and creating or rearranging sand traps. While some of these projects <br />involve hauling dirt around, none would have a significant effect on <br />the watershed, there are no additional ponds to be built, and no <br />designated wetlands involved. Staff would suggest you recommend <br />granting the conditional use permit for the pond and the other pro­ <br />jects, and that applicant be required to obtain a grading permit each <br />spring for the projects to be completed each year. This affords the <br />City some )cnowledge of what earth moving projects are underway while <br />not hindering the applicant. <br />w