07-15-1985 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES Gray Freshwater Biological Institute College of Biological Sciences P.O Box 100 County Roads 15 and 19 Navarre. Minnesota 55392 (612) 471-8476 © iT i’ ^ • • • NIR7RI985 CITY OF OROiNiO N March 27, 1985 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono Box 66 Cryscal Bay, m 55323 Dear Jeannet I am responding to a request for my comments concerning water quality issues as they relate to dredging for establishment of a formal pond and wildlife pond for the Gregory residence. I understand that the dredged material from the wildlife pond will be removed from the site and that the silt control fences will be in place during construction to prevent suspended material from entering Lake Minnetonka. In general I favor the construction of ponds that increase water retention capacity and thus opportunities for sedimentation and nutrient removal in the Lake Minnetonka watershed provided that construction does not cause erosion of materials into the Lake. Mature marshes and wetlands generally release as many nutrients as enter the wetlands. Removal of previously sedimented materials increases the capacity for nutrient removal. I would like to see more of a buffer area at the edge of the wildlife pond adjacent to the proposed erosion control fence. If the grading in this area were at 929 for a distance of 50-100 feet on the edge of the pond, emergent vegetation would filter sediment and other materials before it entered Browns Bay. The formal pond and wildlife pond will inevitably become choked with aquatic vegetation and algae. Odors from decaying algae will be objec tionable and it is likely that control measures will be used. I do not object, and in fact favor, aeration of the formal pond. Because the ponds will communicate with groundwater I would like to see some restrictions on the use of chemical agents to control algae and aquatic vegetation. These restrictions, however, are hard to police. I