My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985 Planning Packets
>
06-17-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:02:53 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:45:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TUE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 12 <br />TIPTON CORPORATION <br />1290 LYMAN AVENUE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />8:49 - 9:15 PM Mike Sjeklocha of 1424 Baldur Park Road was present to <br />represent Tipton Corporation. Chairman Callahan called <br />for the public hearing concerning Tipton's variance <br />application to construct a new residence on Lyman Avenue. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the <br />^®^tificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. <br />Marc fit Tracy Whitehead of 1220 Lyman Avenue were present from <br />the audience for this application. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that <br />Tipton Corporation plans to remove existing house and <br />detached garage and sneds from site and build a new <br />residence. Gaffron noted that the proposed house appears to <br />meet the required front, rear and side setbacks. Gaffron <br />noted his concern that the primary drainfield site will not <br />meet minimum setbacks from the house, and the alternate site <br />is not realistically capable of containing the 1,200 sf <br />drainfield required while maintaining safe setbacks from <br />foundations walls. <br />Marc Whitehead of 1220 Lyman Avenue stated that there is no <br />question that the existing buildings on the property are an <br />eye sore, but that the size of the home proposed is too large. <br />Whitehead stated that he thought the lot size was <br />approximately 1.8 acres (closer to 2 acres), but just found <br />out tonight that it is 1.3 acres. Whitehead noted that he <br />was also surprised that Tipton has already made their <br />proposal to the City, since he and Tipton representatives had <br />conversations relating to trading and/or buying of the lot <br />last year. Whitehead asked to have the issue decided <br />regarding if the driveway was to be a private driveway or <br />vacated roadway. <br />Sime asked Whitehead if he would be willing to sell some of his <br />acreage so that Tipton could combine it with their 1.3 acres. <br />March Whitehead of 1220 Lyman Avenue stated that he might be <br />willing to sell some land, but he doesn ' t know how much land he <br />has now. Whitehead noted if Tipton is willing to go to the <br />expense of surveying his land to find out exactly how much <br />acreage he owns, he might be willing to sell. Whitehead <br />noted that he hasn't had time to investigate and see what his <br />options would be in the future if he sold some land to Tipton. <br />Whitehead stated that the neighbors are concerned that the <br />building will sit too high on the site and ask that the <br />building be lowered so as not to be too conspicious. <br />Whitehead asked that the City enforce the 2 acre minimum and <br />that approving this variance for 1.3 acres could set a <br />precedent.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.