My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
06-17-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:02:53 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:45:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
U Q O O' <br />7/ilj O /W <br />HARDSHIP <br />This piece of property has been owned by my family since December 1955. In <br />1967» I began developing plans to build my retirement home on this property. <br />In 1970, part of the property was declared wetlands and in October 1980, my <br />mother, Amy Edwards, transferred this property to me. <br />The hardships that will be encountered without a 50’ set back are as follows; <br />, A water pipe will have to be'moved. <br />. A mature pine tree and a large willow tree will have to be Over <br />the years, trees have been planted based on a 50' set back. Hit trees <br />will screen the house and provide for a more natural setting. <br />. I recently invested over $11,000 to have a sewer line brought 'o the <br />property. <br />. The neighbors on both sides of the property want my home to be at the <br />same set beck line as their homts. My brother, Richard Edwards, is 43 <br />back from the edge of the lake and Mr. Ed Lehman Is 56’ back. Having <br />my house In line with their houses, provides for more privacy. <br />, I have a very unique view across the lake which is enhanced by the SO’ <br />set back. If the set back had to be 75’, existing evergreens would <br />block the view. <br />DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS <br />The back portion of this property, immediately south of the lagoon. Is <br />mostly peat, going down approximately 19 feet. This was discovered when the <br />sewer pipe was laid in 1985. (An old creek bed is said to be in this sauic <br />area.) The cost of laying the sever line was increased consldf.r®bly because <br />of the unstable soli conditions. The back portion of the property, before <br />the lagoon, is the lowest part of the property (932.3'). In addition to the <br />peat problem In this area, water also drains to and collects here. <br />The highest point of the property (936') is where the best soil conditions <br />are found. If the 75’ set back prevails, I would not be able to see the <br />lake from theCftbund floor windows unless I removed a considerable amount of <br />earth. <br />The driveways on this property are not hardtop, they are mostly dirt with <br />some gravel. I will not be putting in hardtop driveways. <br />This piece of property on which my house is to be located is a very unique <br />piece of land. It has water on both sldes~ln front. Lake Minnetonka; in the <br />rear, the lagoon. Because of the view, the existing mature trees, and the <br />soil and drainage problems on the back part of the property. It seems <br />logical that the house be constructed In line with the existing homes. It <br />will also, with the 50* set back, fit in more naturally with the existing <br />terrain.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.