My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-20-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
05-20-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:55:25 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:43:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5' <br />t. ;f <br />TO: <br />FROM; <br />Planiiinq Coinirii ssion <br />Michael P. Gaffron, AsKistant. Zonimj Administrator <br />DATP.; <br />SUBJECT <br />May 17, 1985 <br />#910 James Hoff, 2056 Shadywoed Road - Conditional <br />Use Permit <br />Zoning District - LR-IC <br />Application -Regrade Lakeshore Yard of Property, All Within <br />0-75' Setback Area <br />Existing Grade - Uniform Slope of about 38% from high plateau dewn <br />to lake <br />Proposed Grade - 24-30% slope <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Survey witii existing and proposed contours <br />The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow him to <br />regrade the lakeshore of his property so that it conforms more to the <br />properties on either side of him. Most of the work proposed is within <br />the 0-75' setback area. His existing slope is about 38% according to <br />the existing grade topographic submittal. The proposal would <br />decrease the slope to about 25% on the averme, but would eliminate the <br />flat plateau which currently acts as runoff percolation area. <br />City Engineer, Glenn Cook, has reviewed the proposal and made these <br />comments: <br />1.The proposed contours as shown do not accomplish the stated <br />pui pose of conforming to the neighl>oring property contours . Note <br />tliat the property to the north has extensive retaining walls. How <br />will the grading conform to these? On the south side, where <br />slopes are less severe, it would likely require less removal of <br />material to conform to the neighboring grades. <br />2.The proposed grade changes vi11 eliminate the existing 30-40' <br />"plateau" area of 6% slopes or less, which now functions as slow- <br />runoff and infiltration area, and change the entire lakeshore yard <br />to slopes of 24-30%. From a runoff i nfi11ration standpoint, this <br />is not necessarily a beneficial project. One-third of the <br />lakeshore yard which formerly had relatively good infiltration <br />characteristics will be retluced in infiltration capacity. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.