Laserfiche WebLink
i-- -. ■■.■13?; Si CITY of OU()x\ () <br />rn*»l OfiMi* l*ii • (‘rysl.il H.'iy. Mifinrsnl.i .V» rj i • Muni< ipiil Otfuts <br />On the i\t)rth Shore u( Lake Minnetonka <br />May 17, 1983 <br />Mrs. V: coria Arneson <br />Mrs. H. R. Nelson <br />3115 Cedar 7%venue South <br />Apt. 3 <br />Minneapolis, Mn. 55*107 <br />RE: 3ic Island Record Lot No. 16 <br />Dear .Mrs. Arneson and .Mrs. Nelson, <br />Enclosed is an information packet on your Big Island property as <br />sent to all ov;ncrs on the island. The purpose of this is to inform <br />you about the nev zoning ordinance adopted last December, and to <br />record information about your property to ensure that your building <br />rights are protected to the fullest intent of the ordinance. <br />I apologize for the delay in getting this informaiton to you. One <br />reason for the delay is that your property as identified by this <br />Record Lot is unusual in several respects. I want to bo sure that <br />you understand what the ordinance says and w.hat options you have <br />available. <br />•he basic intent of the ordinance was to protect and preserve the <br />existing lots with cabins on them, and to allow creation of new <br />building sites only on lots of 5 acres or more in area. This <br />Record Lot totals 2.1G acres of dry land (plus 1.25 acres of wetland) <br />and has one cabin on it, so it has been defined as cne building site <br />in the ordinance. <br />VJhat makes your land unusual is the related ownership and use patterns <br />that tic together s»’*parate parcels owned by three persons: <br />1.The cabin is located on inland property listed to <br />Mrs. H. R. Nelson. This could bo a separate record <br />lot except that access from the lake to the cabin <br />runs thru the Arneson lots. <br />2. The vacant hillside listed to Victoria Arneson totals <br />about 0.65 acre, which in itself is small to be con­ <br />sidered an additional building site. But this is the <br />ideal spot to put up a new cabin to replace the <br />one on the back lot. This could be considered a <br />separate record lot because of tlic separate owruirship <br />if you want it to be. <br />»UI /tiMNt. •admimmr A I ivanci n M l( u<i!<KS 47J-7.'5‘I <br />■