My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:56:13 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />To: <br />From: <br />Planning Commission <br />Michael P. Gnffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />Date: March 13, 1985 <br />Subject: #889 Eugene Nelson, Pig Island - Subdivision <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit I <br />Exhibit J <br />- Application <br />- Flat Map <br />- Property Owners I.ist <br />- Survey and Site Flan <br />- Tr.tle Certificates <br />- Record Lot Sketch <br />- Staff Letter to jay Smedberg 3/8/85 <br />- Selections From Code Section 10.31 <br />“ Lot Area Variance and "Special Lot Combination" <br />Resolution and Other Initial Mailing Documents <br />- Minutes, 2/19/85 Planning Commission Meeting <br />Planning Commission tabled this request at the February <br />meeting pending further staff discussion with the current and <br />pending property owners regarding whether Lot C should bo or can <br />be a sepciiute record lot. <br />A thorough review of the RS Zoning District regulations <br />reveals that when owned in common with the adjacent Lots 6, 7 and <br />8, Lot C cannot by code be a separate record lot (see Section <br />10.31. C'lbdivision 6 (A), attached). The original intent in <br />creax-ji.-j record lots in the RS Zoning District was to recognize <br />existing ownership and usage patterns. Lots 6, 7 & 8 were <br />historically owned by the applicants (Eugene Nelson s) sister; <br />Lot C was owned by his mother; a cabin exists only on Lot ^ ^t <br />Lots 6# 7 & 8 were used as access to Lot C. Both former City <br />Planner, Alan Olson and the Nelson family members apparently <br />agreed that the historical pattern of use was as a single lot, <br />and in fact that is how the applicant is selling it to Mr. <br />Smedberg. But Section 10.31 Subdivision 6 (A) clearly states <br />that when contiguous properties become commonly owned, they by <br />definition are thenceforth considered an a single record lot. <br />To quickly capsulfzo for you the process that was followed <br />when the RS District was created: <br />1. The record lot determination, including which parcels <br />are included in each record lot, became part of the <br />ordinance creating the zoning district. <br />1 <br />n <br />■Midi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.