Laserfiche WebLink
h <br />- <br />TO:Pl-3!inin>j Comm i ss i Oil <br />FROM Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoniny Administratoc <br />DATE:Novfjmber 15, 1934 <br />SUBJECT: #876, Randy Asplund, 34 24 Eastlak(=> Streot - Variance <br />^r^-r A.V r^tu <br />Zoning District - LR-IA <br />Application - A. Variance to construct an 3* high fence along <br />property line adjacent to city street and within 7'* lake <br />Stithick arei. <br />B. After-the-fact variance to allow concrete patios <br />within 75' of the lakeshore. <br />r. i s t of e:Xh i bi ts <br />A <br />3 <br />D <br />E <br />E" <br />G <br />Fenc«! App I i ca t i on <br />Patio Application <br />Plat Mao <br />Property Owners hist <br />Survey Showing Proposed Fence Location V S D-'t L Survey to Scale Showing Existing Patios^ <br />Code Sections Pertinent to Fence Application <br />s-jC'A y <br />A. Fence <br />The applicant wishes to construct an 3' privacy fence along the south <br />1 i lie o f his property abii 11 i iig East lake Street. There is a 3' bermwith <br />pine trees existing at tliis time. It is not clear f to n the app 1 i ca t i on <br />whether the fence will be placed on top of or cslongside the berm. The <br />bf?rm was construc'ted w'neii the new houses wore built and is above the <br />natural grade of the surrounding area. <br />By existing codes , app1icant would be a I lowed a maximum 6 ' fence along <br />the property line in the side and rear (east) yards and a 3 1/2' fence in <br />tlie front (lake) yards ex tena i ng co the lake. East lake Street can not <br />be considered a "major thoroughfare" hence a continuous 6' fen^e would <br />not be allowed along it on that basis. <br />I be 1 ieve you are fami liar with the existing code sections dealing with <br />fences and can relate this application to the fence along Bayside Road <br />just to the east. You could also expect, I am sure, opposition to <br />grfinting of a var iance by the property owners along Eastlake Street who <br />would lose a partin' view of th«> lake. <br />In ordt^r to recommend approveil you would )iave to find a hardship exists <br />and show no adverse effect on the purpose and intent uf the Zoning Code <br />nor the health and welfare of the public. <br />H <br />’5 * <br />! ' <br />^ ! <br />■,'i