My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985 Planning Packets
>
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:56:13 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
\r <br />TO; <br />FROM; <br />DATE; <br />SUBJECT; <br />rliinn i ;kj Coninii ssi on <br />Michac] P. Gaffron, Assintant. Zoning Adnii nist rater <br />March 11, 1985 <br />#897 Janoi & Chuck Peterson, 825 Old Long Lake Road <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearinq <br />Application = 2 lot subdivision <br />Zoning District - RR-lB - 2 acre unsewered <br />Existing Lot Area = 4.39 acrec apf* oximatcly, excluding road <br />No designated wetlands shown on wetlands maps. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Application <br />Property Owiie rs List <br />Plat Map <br />Rough Sketch of Proposed Division <br />Sketch with staff notations <br />The appl i cants are [>roposi ng a subdi visi on of their 4.4 + acre parce 1 on <br />Old Long Lake Road into two lots to create one new building site. <br />Because of the natural swale running diagonally through the property, <br />the proposed dividing line is also angled in order to preserve the <br />logical building site. Note that per Exhibit E, the 200' lot width <br />occurs near the front of the westerly lot and further to the rear of the <br />easterly lot. The proposal leaves approxinat oly 60' of road frontage <br />for the easterly lot. Although the angled dividing line is somewhat <br />unusual it would appear to serve the same purpose as a p>latted 50' <br />corridor, which we have approved in a number of other appl i caitons. <br />Where will the access point be? Where exactly is the existing <br />driveway in relation to the east property line? Will the two lots <br />share a driveway entrance or will a new one be created? Perhaps the <br />applicant can shed some light on this. <br />Septic testing information has not been submitted for either the new <br />lot or for an alternate site for the exist ing house. It is likelythat <br />testing won't be done until the ground thaws, probably sometime in <br />Apri1. <br />Note that the existing house has less than the required west property <br />line setback but meets all other setb.ack requirements within the <br />proposed subdivision. <br />Any recommendation for approval should include the following <br />stipulations; <br />1 . Subject to septic testing approval for both the new lot <br />and an alternate site for the existing house.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.