My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985 Planning Packets
>
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:56:13 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r- <br />r <br />To:rinnninq Commission <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrat <br />Date:March 14, 1985 <br />Subject: #894 T.M. Crosby, 475 Spring Hill Rood - <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Lot Line RearraRearranqemc nt <br />Zoning District - I.R-IA 2 Acre Lakeshore Residential <br />List of Kxhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit F <br />Ai'.|)l icati on & Letter of Transmittal <br />Property Owners List <br />Plat Map <br />Survey <br />Air Photo With Wetlands Overlay <br />Plat Map With Suggested Parcel Break Down For <br />Final Survey <br />The applicant is proposing a lot line rearrangement which <br />will result in the separation of the existing "main” house from <br />the "caretaker" house. The resultinq lot areas are as follows: <br />"Main House" (East I.ot) : 24 + /- Acres (All Dry) <br />"Caretaker House" (West T.ot): 26.8 Acres Total (8+/- Acres Dry) <br />Please refer to Exhibits Fl , F2, F3. Note that due to the <br />extensive designated wetland and adjacent very low land on the <br />W’esterly parcel, future subdivision near East Long Lake Road and <br />Spring Hill Road is highly unlikely. However, the 8 dry acres <br />could be subdivided in the future. We would require dedication <br />of roadways at the time of a future plat. The same holds for <br />Conservation 8r Flcwafni Easements over the wetlands cn Parcel A. <br />Note that (see Exhibit F-3) the easterly lot will become <br />land-locked from the right-of-way and will require the granting <br />of an access easement over the westerly lot to the easterly lot <br />and over both lots to the V.’inston property to the south. The <br />proposed easement shown on the survey. <br />Parcel C is shown apparently to designate the driveway <br />corridor; however. Parcel C is unnecessary since it is proposed <br />to be comliined with Parcel A when the division is complete. It <br />would be less confusing to show Parcel C as a part of Parcel A, <br />leaving just the access easement. <br />We are also requesting that the portion of the westerly lot <br />east of the section line be designated as a separate parcel for <br />clarification purposes. The final combination of lots would be <br />as shown on Exhibit F-2.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.