Laserfiche WebLink
Minneapolis Star and Tribune <br />Thursday <br />March 7/1985 1Y <br />lie zoning, baffle citizens <br />h <br />r -■3S' kuM V =„• <br />^d. Changes In the Coon Rapids comprehensive plan in effect rezoned <br />t a nonconforming use, which restricts changes an J repairs. <br />their zonin|i> orrllnances with com­ <br />prehensive* plans. Mel ropoli tail <br />('ouncil officials have warned local <br />officials that they run the risk of <br />lawsuits If they don't. <br />To avoid such problems. Plymouth <br />officials spent hours in staff time <br />and local hearing last year resolv­ <br />ing differences between their zonir^g <br />ordinances and comprehensive plan, <br />said comprehensive-planning direc­ <br />tor Blair Trernere <br />Coon Rapids started just such an <br />effort in 1^82, but got sidetracked by <br />other development issues. <br />Then late List year, when interest <br />ratf*s dropped on lax^*xempl multi- <br />family housing bonds, the city was <br />flooded with developers’ proposiils to <br />build apartment buildings .Among <br />(hern wa.-» Nedegaard (.‘onstrui lion s <br />M mm mm <br />proposiil fnr two apartment buildings <br />next to R.ismuxsen’s property. <br />Rasmussen first learned of the plans <br />in December, when the Planning <br />(V»mrniss!on was considering a final <br />site plan approval for the project. He <br />and his neighbors argueii that the <br />city should have rezoned the Nede* <br />giiard land from low to high der. aty, <br />which would have required earlier <br />notices to affected residents, hear­ <br />ings on the request and City Council <br />action. <br />Coon Rapids city officials dis-igree, <br />hut they agr**ej to go through the <br />re/i»ning prixess for the apartment <br />development next to Rasmu.csen. <br />Hut that might put the city in a <br />a‘au h 22*’ situation. Starr and This­ <br />tle s-iid Because ate pLins have al- <br />r»*adv Vieen approved for the project. <br />:he city is legally obligated to ap­ <br />prove the rezoning. Starr told Coon <br />Rapids City Council members. <br />If It doesn't, the ciry may find itself <br />in litigation with the developer, <br />said <br />It may he harder to change the zon­ <br />ing than If w:is to make the compre­ <br />hensive plan It lakes a simple ma­ <br />jority of the city's five-member coun­ <br />cil to adopt or change the plan, but it <br />takes four votes to change zoning • <br />With Council M»^mbe^ Carolyn Voss <br />already opposed to the rezoning, <br />Rasmussen and his neighbors need <br />only one more council member’s <br />vote to defeat the proposal <br />Voss said she believes that the resi­ <br />dents were denied due process be­ <br />cause the city relied on its compre­ <br />hensive plan instead of proposing to <br />rczone several properties in the area <br />from low- to hl^-dcnslty residential. <br />"Some of those people have built <br />hou^ies .since we adopted our plan <br />showing the high-dcnslly designa ­ <br />tion." she siild, "but the zoning maps <br />they picked up at City Hall showed <br />that land as zoned for single- family <br />homes, so they really feel milled." <br />.As a result of its experience with the <br />Nedegaard project, said Thistle. <br />Coon Rapids will redouble its efforts <br />to reconcile its zoning and compre­ <br />hensive plan Starr said Coon Rapids <br />also IS warning people requesting <br />zoning maps to consult the city’s <br />comprehensive plan as well <br />To prevent such battles, the .Associa­ <br />tion of Metropolitan Municipalities <br />and member cities such as Plymouth <br />are pushing for a state law requiring <br />the same twothlrds majority vote for <br />comprehensive plan changes and re- <br />zonings, according to AMM execu­ <br />tive director, Vern Peterson, <br />Ironically. Coon Rapids officials who <br />suggested that the association pro- <br />p<ise such a change In state law two <br />years ago now fear it may do them <br />more harm than good <br />The problem I see Is that you might <br />not gel four votes for either ... <br />There's a potential for stalemate/* <br />Thistle said.