My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:56:13 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i©SDWl <br />NiRI2l9e5 <br />iU' <br />3365 Crys^tai Bay Rd <br />WayzataMn 55391 <br />March 8 1985 <br />Members, <br />Planning Commission <br />City Council <br />City of Orono <br />CITY (TF ORONO <br />Dear Members; <br />As I'm uriable to personally attend this meeting I m writing this <br />letter in reference to agenda item *901 concerning Mr. Karl Johnson My <br />wife and 1 live at 3365 Crystal Bay Rd and Mr Johnson is our ne,xt door <br />neighbor. <br />After reading the agenda items it is obvious that variances are <br />being required on two different ordinances. One, a hard cover situatio.. <br />within 75' of the lake and the other, a boat storage regulaiion <br />Let me first address the hardcover situation The area in <br />question was orginally part of a driveway that servicea the residence <br />which is now owned by Ms Sandra George The rest was added to alleviate <br />the mud problem after the area was leveled The city was aware of the <br />whole affair They tagged Mr Johnson for improper disposal of the dirt on <br />the lakeshore The situation was taken care of by Mr Johnson to the city's <br />satisfaction and was considered closed The Planning Commission was also <br />aware of the situation and during a hearing on the plans for the redoing of <br />Ms. George s house, reminded Mr Johnson to be sure to get a retaining wall <br />in as soon as possible. I was present at that meeting with Mr. Johnson and <br />I heard it No mention was made by anybody. Planning Commission or City <br />Offical, of a hardcover violation or any other violation for that matter, <br />except the one previously mentioned Now, because of a vicious and <br />unrelenting verbal and written campaign against both Mr, Johnson and the <br />City, undertaken by a tenant in the George house, the City has decided to <br />require Mr Johnson to get a variance for ttie area in question This simply <br />is not fair If Mr Johnson is guilty of a violation then the City is guilty of <br />neglect for not correcting it v/hen they first knew about it. At this late <br />date, to be fair to Mr Johnson, the subject should be dropped with no <br />futher action taken <br />The boat problem is a different matter altogether. Mr Johnson is <br />being required to get a variance to an ordinance which is violated by <br />alnmst every lakeshore resident in Orono. I myself violate it twice and as <br />you walk down Crystal Bay Rd you see many other violators, including one <br />member of the Planning Commission If you drive along the lakeshore areas <br />of the City many more examples of violations are obvious The fact of the <br />matter is, the ordinance, as it is nov^ exists, is not enforcable and should <br />U <br />¥
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.