My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
03-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:56:13 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
rr.f .4U- • > i -V r^*« \ if« VMk'Vi «A^t. <br />T oanno A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />Prom:Thomas J. Jacobs, Senior Building Inspector <br />Date: <br />Subject; <br />March 13, 1985 <br />#898 l.croy Koehncn, 3360 Shoreline Drive <br />Commercial Site Plan Review <br />Zoning District - B-1 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Application <br />Site Plan <br />Plat Map <br />Test of Existing Tanks <br />Engineer's Report <br />Equipment Specification Sheet <br />Mr. Koehnen has applied to the City to expand his service <br />station at 3360 Shoreline Drive as follows: <br />1. install 10,000 gallon fuel tank <br />2. install canopy over existing gas pumps east of the <br />building <br />3. install a one stall car wash within the existing <br />structure <br />1) Fuel Tank <br />Two 10,000 tanks exist on the property already (regular, <br />unleaded) which have been tested (Exhibit D). O’^e more tank is <br />needed for the sale of super-unleaded. <br />The new tan)« will be reviewed by the inspection department <br />and installed per Minnesota State Fire Code. <br />2) Canopy <br />a) The proposed canopy wi 1 1 be of the same type of <br />materials used on the existing canopy and principle <br />structure. <br />b) A variance will bo needed to install the canopy. A <br />setback of 35' is required in this zoning district. Pro <br />posed setback is 26' from the lo: line, a difference of 9'. <br />The variance of 9' will net be detrimental to traffic <br />visibility because of the height above ground. <br />Required Setback <br />Proposed Setback <br />Varianco <br />Variance % <br />35* <br />26' <br />9' <br />26% <br />1 <br />ii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.