01-21-1985 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r TO: FROM: Plonniivj Commission Miohnel P. GaCCron, Aijsistint Zoning Administrutoir DATE:Moviimbor 15, 1934 SUBJECT: 4876, RunJy Asplund, 3424 Kastlak(> Stre*'t - Variance A-r' A '.- ^ Zoning District - f.R-lA Application - A. Variance to construct an 8' high fence along property line adjacent to city street and «fitliin 75’ lake s«*tback area. B. After-the-fat:t variance to allow concr»^te patios within 75' of the lakoshoc*,-. List of Exhibits A D E F G Fence Application Patio Application Plat Map Property Owners I.ist Survey Showing Proposed Fence Location v ^ ^ L S- Survey to Scale Showing Existing Patios' Code Sections Pertinent to Fence Application '( A y A. Fence The applicant wishes to construct an 8' privacy fence along tne south 1 ine of his prop**rty aba11ing Eas11ako Street. There is a 3' oerm witii pine trees existing at this time. It is not cl»-ic from the applicatj,on whether tlie fence will be placed on top of or alongside t’ne berm. The borm was construc'ted w’o«?n th'^" O'.’W houses wore built and is above the natural grade of the surrounding area. By existin'} codes, applicant W'auld be allowed a maximum 6 fence along the property line in the side and rear (east) yards and a 3 1/2' fence in the front (lake) yards ex tend i n'j to the lake. East lake Street c:an not be considered a "major thoioughf ir<a" hence a continuous 6' fence would not be allowed along it on that basis. I be I i eve you a re f ami I i a r w i th the ex i st i ng code sections deal i ng w i th fences and ciin relate this appl ication to the fence along Bayside Road just to the east. You coulil also expect, I am sure, opposition to granting of a variance by the pr lupe r ty owners along Eastlake Street who would lose a partial view of the lake. In ot'ler to recommend approval you would )iave to find a har«lship exists and show no adverse effect on the purpose and intent of the Zoning Code nor the health an«l welfare of th*- public.