My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-1985 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
12-16-1985 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:22:04 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:20:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B 4 <br />nend <br />tion <br />in <br />ated <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 16, 1985. PAGE 5 <br />#983 WALTER H. PEMBERTON <br />1. To limit the fill in the 0-75' zone to only that <br />necessary to accomodate the garage and driveway back-up <br />apron. <br />2. The proposed house must meet all specifications of <br />the Building Inspector of the City of Orono. If the <br />house changes in proportion, the applicant must come <br />back for review by the Planning Commission and Council. <br />3. Applicant must inform the City of the date of which <br />the fill will be delivered to the lot. <br />4. Front deck must remain as an open deck - it cannot <br />be enclosed. <br />5. Staff to secure proper erosion control. <br />Mr. Pemberton questioned if no fill is required, because of <br />the push back of the garage, will staff still have to <br />monitor. <br />.t of <br />ilyn <br />the <br />when <br />ding <br />this <br />r Tom <br />Lt is <br />con- <br />as a <br />thus <br />imend <br />owing <br />f 5’, <br />rover <br />set- <br />s lot <br />Kelley stated that yes, the City still should be notified at <br />that point. <br />Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. <br />Chairman Callahan opposed the motion because the lot is too <br />small for the proposed house and garage, and the variances <br />could be eliminated if the applicant were to build only on <br />the existing foundation. <br />McDonald also opposed the motion based on the same findings <br />as Chairman Callahan and also the City should maintain a mix <br />of housing, all income levels and family sizes. <br />#987 ROBERT J. BAUMAN <br />1040 TONKAWA ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />SECOND REVIEW <br />Robert and Joan Bauman were present. Bob Gasch of 2960 Fox <br />Street and Marge Gasch of 1030 Tonkawa Road were also present <br />from the public. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron presented the <br />Commission with a letter submitted by the Marge Gasch which <br />Chairman Callahan read (Exhibit B). <br />Kelley clarified that there is no need for a hardcover <br />variance because of the trade-offs done for a previous appli <br />cation and the only variance needed is for average lakeshore <br />setback.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.