Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 1 <br />ATTENDANCE 7:30 PM <br />*394 T.M. CROSBY <br />745 SPRING HILL ROAD <br />SUBDIVISION OP LOT <br />LINE REARRANGEMENT <br />CLASS I <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />7:30 - 7:40 PM <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date <br />with the following members present; Chairman <br />Callahan, Kelley, Goetten, Rovegno, McDonald and <br />Taylor. Sime was absent. Zoning Administrator <br />Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron and <br />Recorder Naab represented the City staff. Council <br />Representative Grabek was absent. <br />T.M. Crosby was present. Assistant Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of <br />mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was <br />no one present from the public for this application. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained <br />Exhibits F1-F3. FI being the existing property <br />boundaries, F3 being the desired end point by split­ <br />ting the lots so t: 3 caretaker house is on a separate <br />parcel with approximately 8 acres of dry land. The <br />main house being on a separate parcel. F2 showing <br />the way this can be done by rearranging lot lines. <br />Mr. Crosby stated that the smaller parcel shown on <br />the map will be given to the Winstcns (who own <br />property to the south) which will square off their <br />property. <br />Rovegno clarified that Pa r ce Is A, Dand Cwill be one <br />lot of record. Parcel B wi 11 be one lot of record. <br />Gaffron clarified part of what is shown as designated <br />wetlands is part of meandered lakeshore and therefore <br />owned by the State of Minnesota. There is no point <br />in requiring dedication since it is already <br />essentially dedicated. <br />Rovegno questioned why dedication of roadway was not <br />requested at this time since there are three houses <br />involved. <br />Goetten stated that this could be added in the <br />resolution that any further subdivision of any of the <br />involved parcels would at that point be required to <br />dedicate roadways.